Part of the reason we can’t resolve this is people constantly fall into the trap of trying to frame the solutions around what would have stopped the mass shooting incident du jour. It is the absolutely wrong way to go about this.
I agree these types of mass shooting incidents are not reflective of a high proportion of the gun violence burden in the US. |
^^do not represent a high proportion of the GV burden. |
And there are plenty of conservatives that want to take away gay people's right to get married. Do you want to be defined by the most extreme part of your circle or acknowledge the reality that most of us aren't trying to round up all the guns. Or at least that we realize that is not the right course. For example if I could wave wand tomorrow and vanish every gun I would but I also understand that the majority of americans don't want that and that I live in a democracy so even if I were the president I would not try to take away all the guns, despite that being my desire. Getting hung up because a small portion of people would do something you really really don't want is really really stupid. |
The author understands by far most.gun violence is by young black males so she wants there.to be a.distinction between the.types of gun violence so the.white.loan wolf shooters are dealt.with but somehow insulating the far.more.prevalent black gang.bangers from enhanced law.enforcement techniques. |
The period thing is exhausting. |
The reality of the situation is that your side hasn’t not made even small motions toward compromise on anything. This will eventually bite you in the butt because the folks saying “ban everything” will sound like (and are) the appropriate counterweight to “do nothing”. Had your side not gotten in bed with Wayne and the NRA, the “ban all guns” people would stay a small minority. |
Why are you blaming Republicans for this? Can you cite some legislation? |