|
I'm a waitress, so I'm pretty close to the bottom. There are no jobs beneath me. They would just break my back. Can't be dishwasher, the detergent eats into my skin already now. I cannot cook, cannot make desserts or salads. I clean a little at work, but to do it full time, I'd have to get in better shape that I am now.
Rich people never stopped eating out- that's how we survived the last recession. Some of us got 2nd jobs when people eat out less. |
Pp here. I agree with you, and I don't do it anyone. But it was a hard habit to break after a lifetime of thinking that "team players" will chip in on whatever needs doing and that "no job is beneath me". And I will admit to still feeling guilty asking others to do tasks that are more convenient for me, simply because my role is "above" that. And it's not just the "female" jobs either. The other day my team was unloading some new equipment that arrived for our project. I, as the team lead, jumped in and started carrying boxes. A few guys came up to me and said I didn't need to carry that, they'd get the techs to take care of it for me. |
I do. Like accounting for example. |
| I wouldn't work in a slaughterhouse. |
But that's not the question - about money. I find it strange when people equate prestige with money. |
I think it's also nice that he said that - from the perspective of not pegging the woman as the coffee-getter (and sad that this is a "nice" move). A better move would be for HIM to have made it. |
|
I think that there are jobs that it's resource inefficient to assign to me. For instance, I CAN do secretarial work (but not as well as most real secretaries) but since I get paid more than a secretary it makes sense to instead give me work others can't do. It happens that what I can do and others can't IS a bit "higher level" and/or pay.
The whole gender dynamic really grates at me. Jim saying "Oh, I just can't do notes at the meeting" seems to be a common excuse, so Suzie is stuck with it. |
Ok but the way you describe that job, it's basically beneath everybody. Nobody likes those conditions. |
Yep. It plays out again and again. I know several men in their 30's and 40's, bright guys who had a lot going for them in high school and college. After graduating, they were shocked that they weren't getting offered full time, well paid office jobs at cool or prestige organizations. Instead of hustling at internships, clerical jobs, or anything to earn money, they gave up. Live at home, do drugs, endless pity parties. Nothing is their fault. I don't know one woman in this situation. |
I was in exact same position just in a small consulting firm. I had to do dishes after bunch of assholes. |
| Duh. |
Does someone have to like those conditions to have another person consider the job beneath them? |
+2 I worked in restaurants in my twenties - considered myself a free spirit but was just aimless. My parents, typical type A Washingtonians, were horrified. They'd talk up any side thing I'd have going on with their friends and were SO relieved when I finally got a "real job." Most people on this board consider restaurant and service work beneath them, I'm sure. It's hilarious because working with the public in the capacity I did took so much grace under pressure, ability to constantly multitask (for hours on end), and actually required a great deal of education and knowledge (about food and wine) that I was expected to constantly update. I knock off so much in my professional life now, and most people I work with are both lazy and entitled. The irony. |
And/or does PP consider the job beneath anyone? Or just people without formal education? |
In our society, why do you find this strange? |