Has Corey Feldman named his abuser yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not surprised he doesn't/can't come forward. He is not in a position of authority. The years of abuse have made it hard to withstand a lawsuit.

He said he would "back somebody up" if they sued.

He said it was a big time producer and a network of other people.

http://people.com/celebrity/corey-feldman-on-child-sexual-abuse-in-hollywood-and-corey-haim/

I don't think Charlie Sheen falls under that category.

While Charlie certainly has "issues;" I had not heard that "pedophile/bi-sexual rapist" was one of them.

Sheen seems more like the porn-star, group-sex, voeyure type.

Are both Coreys being tight-lipped about the network of Hollywood pedophiles who raped them?

Well the second Corey is dead so...yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought I read on a gossip forum that it was Rob Reiner or Steven Speilberg.

GTFO. File that under don't believe everything you read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought I read on a gossip forum that it was Rob Reiner or Steven Speilberg.

GTFO. File that under don't believe everything you read.

Feldman specifically said it was not Speilberg and the Speilberg was one of the few good guys.

[Anonymous]

He's said the initials are SS.

[Anonymous]

I have been wondering if it was Weinstein! If it is, I hope he'll come forward with it.

I thought I had read that he said it wasn't Spielberg?

[Anonymous]

I didn't think Weinstein was interested in boys?

[Anonymous]

I don't think Weinstein is interested in boys because in the New Yorker piece one of the sources who arranged his "meetings" specifically said he only did it for women.

I actually think there are just that many predators in Hollywood that Feldman's abuser wouldn't necessarily be the one we know about.

Also...thought this was crazy: http://pagesix.com/2017/10/10/terry-crews-details-alleged-sexual-assault-by-high-level-hollywood-exec/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Feldman is doing more harm than good to the cause. Without naming names, but continuing to say "oh, it's out there all right", he comes off as a relevancy seeking boy who cries wolf. It makes the whole thing seem very pizza-gate and unbelievable.

Think of ashley judd. She wrote her story and left names out first. It comes in steps.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't think Weinstein is interested in boys because in the New Yorker piece one of the sources who arranged his "meetings" specifically said he only did it for women.

I actually think there are just that many predators in Hollywood that Feldman's abuser wouldn't necessarily be the one we know about.

Also...thought this was crazy: http://pagesix.com/2017/10/10/terry-crews-details-alleged-sexual-assault-by-high-level-hollywood-exec/

Oh my gosh. I <3 terry crews. I hope others will back him up now that he has put it out there.

[Anonymous]

Re the Cories: I heard it was Spielberg. Tom Hanks' name floats around, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Re the Cories: I heard it was Spielberg. Tom Hanks' name floats around, too.

Where did you hear that? I remember reading an interview where he had said he could not name a name, and then specifically said Steven was a great guy and that he didn't get to see him a ton

[Anonymous]

I always have felt incredibly sad for Corey Feldman. Whatever happened to him as a kid must have been pretty horrible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feldman is doing more harm than good to the cause. Without naming names, but continuing to say "oh, it's out there all right", he comes off as a relevancy seeking boy who cries wolf. It makes the whole thing seem very pizza-gate and unbelievable.

Think of ashley judd. She wrote her story and left names out first. It comes in steps.

Think of the NYT reporter who had this story in 2004 - backed it up with sources - but was told by the NYT editors to bury it.

With everything that has come out since 2004, it is understandable that so many American voters give very little credibility to sources like the NYT, WaPo, etc.

Journalists no longer abide by any ethical standards in the U.S.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not surprised he doesn't/can't come forward. He is not in a position of authority. The years of abuse have made it hard to withstand a lawsuit.

He said he would "back somebody up" if they sued.

He said it was a big time producer and a network of other people.

http://people.com/celebrity/corey-feldman-on-child-sexual-abuse-in-hollywood-and-corey-haim/

I don't think Charlie Sheen falls under that category.

While Charlie certainly has "issues;" I had not heard that "pedophile/bi-sexual rapist" was one of them.

Sheen seems more like the porn-star, group-sex, voeyure type.

Are both Coreys being tight-lipped about the network of Hollywood pedophiles who raped them?

I read that Charlie Sheen def passed the Coreys around.

[Anonymous]

Aren't there lots of seemingly credible rumors that Brian Singer runs/is part of a pedophile ring? Maybe the culprit is connected to that.