I'm a teacher and my DH is getting his masters in the administration as part of the MCPS principal training program. He's been teaching for 15 years and has a ton of experience in a variety of demographics. He's been in leadership at the school level almost since he started--he's sponsored student clubs, been a team leader, organized overnight field trips, created new "outreach" clubs for specific groups that need support (ex: a mentorship type club for students with multiple suspensions to get them turned around). Everyone he works with loves him. He's Latino and had never considered administration until his principal told him that there were no Latino principals and the county was actively looking to recruit Latino leadership. He wanted to be a role model to his students. That was his motivation for applying to the principal program. It's rigorous, and it's been tough on our family, but he is dedicated. He is going to be so freaking good at this job, because he has all the experience, leadership, and motivation that makes a good administrator. My current principal is new this year, is 32 years old, and was a teacher for four years before leaving the classroom for a bunch of "leadership" jobs. He knows all the buzzwords and policies, but is a very weak leader, as far as I'm concerned. It seems so bizarre to me that this guy and my DH will be seen by MCPS as equal in this position. |
Agreed. A lot of people think this may be the case. There really is no other explanation on why she is allowed to remain in that position. |