MSDC Seats Availalble updated for 17-18

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.

Looks like they grew PK3 size. Quite a few seats offered in 5th. Are parents peeling off to Latin/BASIS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.

Looks like they grew PK3 size. Quite a few seats offered in 5th. Are parents peeling off to Latin/BASIS?

Or Hardy, Deal, or private..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.

Looks like they grew PK3 size. Quite a few seats offered in 5th. Are parents peeling off to Latin/BASIS?

Or Hardy, Deal, or private..

(But they weren't 6th grade seats, they were 5th grade seats)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.

Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.

Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.

That's not what it says, they offered, starting at PK3
55
4
5
1
1
0
0
14
19
3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.

Looks like they grew PK3 size. Quite a few seats offered in 5th. Are parents peeling off to Latin/BASIS?

Or Hardy, Deal, or private..

(But they weren't 6th grade seats, they were 5th grade seats)

Good point.

But this is only round 1 seats made available -- no parents would have yet gotten into Latin or BASIS and those are not sure things.

[Anonymous]

Stuart Hobson showing 1's for all three years, down from prior years. Will be interesting to see if their WL #s reflect the reduced number of projected seats. Don't want to get ahead of myself here, but maybe this is the beginning of the elusive CH MS...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.

Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.

CMI didn't offer seats for those grades in the initial round for 16-17, but if you scroll down you see they did make a number of WL offers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.

Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.

That's not what it says, they offered, starting at PK3
55
4
5
1
1
0
0
14
19
3

Relax, Francis. My response was in reply to someone who commented on CMI offering more seats than in prior years. My response noted that the prior year's reported data was very unlikely to have been accurate with all zeros. It is a comparison thing. Watch you don't fall off your high horsey and hurt your pretty little head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stuart Hobson showing 1's for all three years, down from prior years. Will be interesting to see if their WL #s reflect the reduced number of projected seats. Don't want to get ahead of myself here, but maybe this is the beginning of the elusive CH MS...

That's what people said about Hardy last year (round 1 was 25/10/10, but they wound up going pretty deep into the WL.

Hardy this year offered 25/30/30 for 17-18 -- attrition or is the school growing by that much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.

Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.

That's not what it says, they offered, starting at PK3
55
4
5
1
1
0
0
14
19
3

Relax, Francis. My response was in reply to someone who commented on CMI offering more seats than in prior years. My response noted that the prior year's reported data was very unlikely to have been accurate with all zeros. It is a comparison thing. Watch you don't fall off your high horsey and hurt your pretty little head.

Chill Nancy, I'll see you at the spring auction on the 13th

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.

Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.

CMI didn't offer seats for those grades in the initial round for 16-17, but if you scroll down you see they did make a number of WL offers.

Yes, because that's what the data that we are all looking at said. But thanks. Again, my response was to someone who was comparing slots offered having risen. But that was against all zeros. And, again, it strikes me as odd that a charter school (i.e., no IB preference showing up on day 10 would have had 100% re-enrollment.

[Anonymous]

Mundo Verde has 44 K slots this year. Is this an expansion year or did they have a mass exodus?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mundo Verde has 44 K slots this year. Is this an expansion year or did they have a mass exodus?

They always expand at K.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mundo Verde has 44 K slots this year. Is this an expansion year or did they have a mass exodus?

They always expand at K.

7 last year, 34 year prior. Explanation more complex than "they always do".