Saw Gwenyth Paltrow and......

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:what a depressing worldview. you were at a presumably lovely restaurant in a wonderful city and happen to glimpse a talented actress and your reaction is to shit on her looks.

NP. Why is that sad?

[Anonymous]

Looks-wise, I think she is someone that will look better with an extra 10 lbs as she ages so she doesn't look too gaunt, especially in the face.

However, luckily, not all of a woman's value is in her looks. She seems to be doing well for herself, so kudos to her. I'm not her target audience, but I applaud women who can translate acting into something else as they age out of hollywood.

[Anonymous]

Gwyneth is not at all European looking, IMO (I've spent time around Europeans, I am Persian). While I am darker and partial to the darker look, I do feel like Gwyneth looks rather pale and sickly.

[Anonymous]

I was in the same restaurant as her years ago in London (back when Madonna and Guy Ritchie were married - they were at the same table - best celeb spot ever!) and she looked radiant - her skin just glowed. And she held the bathroom door open for me, so she gets points for being polite too.

[Anonymous]

At least she was pretty at one point. These ugly starlets like Emma Stone, Anna Kendrick, etc. that are plain janes at best yet shoved down our throat as beauties makes me sick.

[Anonymous]

^ forgot to add Sarah Jessica Parker

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At least she was pretty at one point. These ugly starlets like Emma Stone, Anna Kendrick, etc. that are plain janes at best yet shoved down our throat as beauties makes me sick.

Emma Stone is a plain jane? Huh? I agree with Anna Kendrick, and you can JLaw to that list, but Emma Stone is quite traditionally beautiful...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has a traditional old European beauty - tall, white, blonde, thin, and delicate but sort of sickly/fragile looking.

She's not ugly, but it isn't what more people find physically attractive today.

I don't even think she looks European. I think someone like Nicole Kidman, Emma Stone, or Kate Winslet fit much more into the traditional "european looking" beauties.

But then I find them to be actually beautiful, and I think Gyneth is plain faced with a large schnoz.

I think it's odd that Gwyneth has a large schnoz but that Kate doesn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has a traditional old European beauty - tall, white, blonde, thin, and delicate but sort of sickly/fragile looking.

She's not ugly, but it isn't what more people find physically attractive today.

I don't even think she looks European. I think someone like Nicole Kidman, Emma Stone, or Kate Winslet fit much more into the traditional "european looking" beauties.

But then I find them to be actually beautiful, and I think Gyneth is plain faced with a large schnoz.

I think it's odd that Gwyneth has a large schnoz but that Kate doesn't.

I don't, considering she's had surgery

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least she was pretty at one point. These ugly starlets like Emma Stone, Anna Kendrick, etc. that are plain janes at best yet shoved down our throat as beauties makes me sick.

Emma Stone is a plain jane? Huh? I agree with Anna Kendrick, and you can JLaw to that list, but Emma Stone is quite traditionally beautiful...

See Superbad. She's a plane Jane we've been brainwashed to believe is gorgeous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least she was pretty at one point. These ugly starlets like Emma Stone, Anna Kendrick, etc. that are plain janes at best yet shoved down our throat as beauties makes me sick.

Emma Stone is a plain jane? Huh? I agree with Anna Kendrick, and you can JLaw to that list, but Emma Stone is quite traditionally beautiful...

See Superbad. She's a plane Jane we've been brainwashed to believe is gorgeous.

Nah, she was gorgeous in Superbad too. She is one of the few gorgeous ones

[Anonymous]

Emma stone winning now! She just seems genuine and full of spunk which makes her beauty more than skin deep.

[Anonymous]

She's definitely better looking than 90% of the human population . Have you looked around? It's horrifying. Just look at any random group picture... It's amazing the world is populated.

That said.. She has a sickening annoying narcissism . She's one of those people you almost hope ends up in hell just so you can watch her apologize for her self centered aura with tears just flying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was in NYC last weekend and went to a restaurant where Gwenyth Paltrow was seated with two friends. Um...sorry but aside from being tall and lanky (will give her that) she is almost unattractive, almost homily. Seriously! I do not get how she got to where she is. She was not a looker by any stretch. I used to think she was not so bad and didn't understand when people criticized her looks but having seen her in person...I get it. Is her acting really that great? Jury is out.

I'm sure she cares what you think, OP - with her net worth of $60m.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gwyneth is not at all European looking, IMO (I've spent time around Europeans, I am Persian). While I am darker and partial to the darker look, I do feel like Gwyneth looks rather pale and sickly.

"European looking?"

lol

I'm first gen Italian - could have been born there had my maternal grandparents stayed there to raise my mom. NO ONE has ever thought I was Italian, especially not Southern Italian, which is where both sides are from. I even checked out my DNA and came out "80% purebred." so no questions there

Europeans do not have "one look."