+1. We allow nearly unlimited use of technology (unless it would be inappropriate in a given situation) as long as it's not causing a problem in DD's life, as defined by interfering with her ability to meet her other obligations such as school, family, volunteering, health, etc. I have high expectations for my children but I see little reason to impose limits on most things if my kids are showing enough responsibility and self-discipline to figure out how to meet expectations on their own without my intervention. |
Sanctimony, often involves hypocrisy, but the definition does not require it. It's more "holier than thou" see Oxford Dictionary "Making a show of being morally superior to other people:" ‘what happened to all the sanctimonious talk about putting his family first?’ |
| When people tell me what they are doing to give their kids an "advantage" I'm ok with it. When they tell me I should also be doing it, I always ask "If everyone does something, isn't the "advantage" gone?" |
| Eh I had a friend I made when our firsts were babies amd then she went the strict Waldorf route. It is too extreme IMO and starts to become rather cult-like. |
|
I had planned to be strict, except my 7 year old started getting into coding and creating code. When I realized she was actually really good at it we let her have unlimited access to computers. Now she is going to a math and science program on scholarship.
Not everything is sexting and YouTube. |
| Doesn't allow pop music? What could possibly be the point? |
Oof. I watched too much TV and played nintendo too much growing up and it didn't interfere with anything that my parents would have noticed, but man was it bad for me. I wish we didn't have a TV growing up or my parents found a way to lock it up for all but 1-2 hrs/day. I think it exacerbated my sense of isolation and depression. It's simply not good for your developing brain or eyes to be on the screen so much, even if you're doing fine in school and have friends/activities/etc. |