Do you think Mike Rowe will run for office?

[Anonymous]

Another balding politician in a baseball cap?

[Anonymous]

jesus people - what kind of qualifications does he have to be anything other than a reality show host??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:jesus people - what kind of qualifications does he have to be anything other than a reality show host??

In all seriousness, he is a trained opera singer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:jesus people - what kind of qualifications does he have to be anything other than a reality show host??

I hope that's tongue in cheek.

Ask Sonny Bono, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Al Franken, Clint Eastwood, Jesse Ventura, etc etc.

[Anonymous]

So sick of no-nothings running for office and winning. I don't hire a non-lawyer to argue a case. I don't choose an undergrad to perform a medical procedure. I don't get why people want a politician with no political experience, no idea of the world stage, and no track record of working with legislators.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:jesus people - what kind of qualifications does he have to be anything other than a reality show host??

What qualifications does it take to run for an office? He has a college degree. He can write well and has the ear of a lot of people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you bigots think middle, blue collar America can't stand gay people? Are you aware we're in 2016? It's not 1950 any more? They also don't ride horses to school and they have indoor plumbing. Shocking, isn't it?

Because of people like Mike Pence ... the person you just put in the Vice President's office.

Because Indiana is where you had that stupid fucking bakery who was so bigoted it couldn't even sell a damn cake to a couple of lesbians.

If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, it's most likely a duck.

You're judging an entire swath of the country based on Pence and a bakery in Indiana? Are you so blind that you don't realize that the oh-so-elite coasts are easily judged negatively by that same limited perspective?

But I suppose a bigot like you has to try to feel superior somehow. Enjoy.

NP. Again, many of us are from these areas and know that there are some people there who embrace equal rights for all, just as we know there are many who do not. But we've just been yelled at for the last three weeks by online morons and their sycophantic media telling us how all of us elites (talk about being bigoted) lost the election by thinking equal rights for all was a good idea. Now you're trying to pretend everyone feels the same way?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So sick of no-nothings running for office and winning. I don't hire a non-lawyer to argue a case. I don't choose an undergrad to perform a medical procedure. I don't get why people want a politician with no political experience, no idea of the world stage, and no track record of working with legislators.

Ah, I see what you're saying. So you think there should be a regulatory board and formal education for politicians like there are for doctors and lawyers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of no-nothings running for office and winning. I don't hire a non-lawyer to argue a case. I don't choose an undergrad to perform a medical procedure. I don't get why people want a politician with no political experience, no idea of the world stage, and no track record of working with legislators.

Ah, I see what you're saying. So you think there should be a regulatory board and formal education for politicians like there are for doctors and lawyers.

What a smart comment. Let me make it simpler for you. I don't want someone learning a job from scratch if they're elected to do that job. Just like I wouldn't want a lady that I hired to cook my dinner to try to teach herself cooking basics. Easier for you? Love how you look for any excuse to justify electing incompetent fools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of no-nothings running for office and winning. I don't hire a non-lawyer to argue a case. I don't choose an undergrad to perform a medical procedure. I don't get why people want a politician with no political experience, no idea of the world stage, and no track record of working with legislators.

Ah, I see what you're saying. So you think there should be a regulatory board and formal education for politicians like there are for doctors and lawyers.

What a smart comment. Let me make it simpler for you. I don't want someone learning a job from scratch if they're elected to do that job. Just like I wouldn't want a lady that I hired to cook my dinner to try to teach herself cooking basics. Easier for you? Love how you look for any excuse to justify electing incompetent fools.

As long as we're hiring people to cook my dinner, I'd hire a man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of no-nothings running for office and winning. I don't hire a non-lawyer to argue a case. I don't choose an undergrad to perform a medical procedure. I don't get why people want a politician with no political experience, no idea of the world stage, and no track record of working with legislators.

Ah, I see what you're saying. So you think there should be a regulatory board and formal education for politicians like there are for doctors and lawyers.

What a smart comment. Let me make it simpler for you. I don't want someone learning a job from scratch if they're elected to do that job. Just like I wouldn't want a lady that I hired to cook my dinner to try to teach herself cooking basics. Easier for you? Love how you look for any excuse to justify electing incompetent fools.

Yeah, how about those dolts who elected rookie Reagan as governor of California. Ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of no-nothings running for office and winning. I don't hire a non-lawyer to argue a case. I don't choose an undergrad to perform a medical procedure. I don't get why people want a politician with no political experience, no idea of the world stage, and no track record of working with legislators.

Ah, I see what you're saying. So you think there should be a regulatory board and formal education for politicians like there are for doctors and lawyers.

What a smart comment. Let me make it simpler for you. I don't want someone learning a job from scratch if they're elected to do that job. Just like I wouldn't want a lady that I hired to cook my dinner to try to teach herself cooking basics. Easier for you? Love how you look for any excuse to justify electing incompetent fools.

Yeah, how about those dolts who elected rookie Reagan as governor of California. Ridiculous.

Agreed that Reagan was a terrible choice. Even worse as President. Didn't he have Alzheimer's toward the end, too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of no-nothings running for office and winning. I don't hire a non-lawyer to argue a case. I don't choose an undergrad to perform a medical procedure. I don't get why people want a politician with no political experience, no idea of the world stage, and no track record of working with legislators.

Ah, I see what you're saying. So you think there should be a regulatory board and formal education for politicians like there are for doctors and lawyers.

What a smart comment. Let me make it simpler for you. I don't want someone learning a job from scratch if they're elected to do that job. Just like I wouldn't want a lady that I hired to cook my dinner to try to teach herself cooking basics. Easier for you? Love how you look for any excuse to justify electing incompetent fools.

Yeah, how about those dolts who elected rookie Reagan as governor of California. Ridiculous.

Agreed that Reagan was a terrible choice. Even worse as President. Didn't he have Alzheimer's toward the end, too?

Equally ridiculous to elect a young know nothing Navy officer to the House. What was his name? John Kennedy or some such?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of no-nothings running for office and winning. I don't hire a non-lawyer to argue a case. I don't choose an undergrad to perform a medical procedure. I don't get why people want a politician with no political experience, no idea of the world stage, and no track record of working with legislators.

Ah, I see what you're saying. So you think there should be a regulatory board and formal education for politicians like there are for doctors and lawyers.

What a smart comment. Let me make it simpler for you. I don't want someone learning a job from scratch if they're elected to do that job. Just like I wouldn't want a lady that I hired to cook my dinner to try to teach herself cooking basics. Easier for you? Love how you look for any excuse to justify electing incompetent fools.

Yeah, how about those dolts who elected rookie Reagan as governor of California. Ridiculous.

Agreed that Reagan was a terrible choice. Even worse as President. Didn't he have Alzheimer's toward the end, too?

Equally ridiculous to elect a young know nothing Navy officer to the House. What was his name? John Kennedy or some such?

God, you're stupid. Trying reading a book or learning about American history. Kennedy was a seasoned politician. But really, keep trying to justify your ridiculous choices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of no-nothings running for office and winning. I don't hire a non-lawyer to argue a case. I don't choose an undergrad to perform a medical procedure. I don't get why people want a politician with no political experience, no idea of the world stage, and no track record of working with legislators.

Ah, I see what you're saying. So you think there should be a regulatory board and formal education for politicians like there are for doctors and lawyers.

What a smart comment. Let me make it simpler for you. I don't want someone learning a job from scratch if they're elected to do that job. Just like I wouldn't want a lady that I hired to cook my dinner to try to teach herself cooking basics. Easier for you? Love how you look for any excuse to justify electing incompetent fools.

Yeah, how about those dolts who elected rookie Reagan as governor of California. Ridiculous.

Agreed that Reagan was a terrible choice. Even worse as President. Didn't he have Alzheimer's toward the end, too?

Equally ridiculous to elect a young know nothing Navy officer to the House. What was his name? John Kennedy or some such?

God, you're stupid. Trying reading a book or learning about American history. Kennedy was a seasoned politician. But really, keep trying to justify your ridiculous choices.

A seasoned politician at the ripe old age of 30 when he was elected to the House. C'mon.