Drain the swamp and fill it with filthy rich people

[Anonymous]

The folks is the square states know that no poor person ever gave them a job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like Billary, OP? You're a fool.

Billary did not fill the cabinet with filthy rich people. HRC has never been president.

You are the fool, a very big one for thinking Trump would actually "drain the swamp" and fulfill his campaign promises.

Time will tell, my friend, not you. Sorry.

[Anonymous]

I think we need a bigger swamp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who better than billionaires to tell the little people how to run their lives?

Haha... we get the democracy we deserve , I guess.

Yep. Give the people what they want, good and hard.

[Anonymous]

Why not? Theyre smart and successful and know how to make money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like Billary, OP? You're a fool.

Billary did not fill the cabinet with filthy rich people. HRC has never been president.

You are the fool, a very big one for thinking Trump would actually "drain the swamp" and fulfill his campaign promises.

Time will tell, my friend, not you. Sorry.

That's right, there is still time to nominate some outsiders of more modest means. They are coming. Palin isn't all that rich last time I checked. Petreaus either, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why not? Theyre smart and successful and know how to make money.

Isn't that why you argued Hillary shouldn't be President? Help me understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The possibility of the Exxon CEO for SoS....my heart can't take anymore

Perhaps Mexico wants you?

At least there are jobs there. Lots of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The possibility of the Exxon CEO for SoS....my heart can't take anymore

Perhaps Mexico wants you?

At least there are jobs there. Lots of them.

And more coming each year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The folks is the square states know that no poor person ever gave them a job.

The rich people don't seem to be doing such a good job of that either. Now they'll just be jobless without a social safety net. Good times. MAGAing ourselves right back to 1933. Sure was fun back then. Just ask Steve Bannon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, having a billionaire run the Department of Education will certainly allow her to become wealthier. Instead of the kiddies selling chocolate bars and Sally Foster wrapping paper, they will be flogging Amway.

What a sinister plot!

You mean Scamway?

Or the fact that she's a proponent of charter schools ...and has business interests in the charter school industry. No conflict of interest there. ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why not? Theyre smart and successful and know how to make money.

Is making money the mission of the Department of Education? Or the VA? interesting ...

[Anonymous]

OP, as if the previous swamp dwellers were dirt poor LOL

I know, I know they said they were. But come on!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, having a billionaire run the Department of Education will certainly allow her to become wealthier. Instead of the kiddies selling chocolate bars and Sally Foster wrapping paper, they will be flogging Amway.

What a sinister plot!

You mean Scamway?

Or the fact that she's a proponent of charter schools ...and has business interests in the charter school industry. No conflict of interest there. ?

"Conflicts of interest" are for Democrats and poor people.

[Anonymous]

Trump to GOP: How to defend my cabinet picks

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/12/01/trump-to-gop-heres-how-to-defend-my-cabinet-picks/?utm_term=.a62b6bdea398

Swamp indeed.