West Point Cadets Give Nod to BLM

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hey Op, you know that black lives matter is NOT anti-police, right?

I support the majority of police who are out there doing the right thing as well as the black lives matter movement that wants to fix the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing.

+1. Calling the Black Lives Matter movement "anti-police" does not actually make it so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Op, you know that black lives matter is NOT anti-police, right?

I support the majority of police who are out there doing the right thing as well as the black lives matter movement that wants to fix the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing.

This is too complex for op and millions of others.

Not too complex. I just disagree. Your "tolerant" liberal attitude is showing.

This isn't about tolerance. This is about calling you out when you're incorrect.

No....it is YOU who feels I am incorrect. Just because my opinion differs from yours does not make it incorrect. Your thinking so is the intolerance. It's been noted by others than liberals are tolerant as long as you agree with them. Might be too complex a concept for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This anti-cop attitude is now showing up on the grounds of America's most respected military academy:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/08/us/west-point-cadets-photo/

Oh ! You fragile soul, what are you going to about it . This ain't your great grandpa America's anymore . Cry me an ocean

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Op, you know that black lives matter is NOT anti-police, right?

I support the majority of police who are out there doing the right thing as well as the black lives matter movement that wants to fix the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing.

This is too complex for op and millions of others.

Not too complex. I just disagree. Your "tolerant" liberal attitude is showing.

This isn't about tolerance. This is about calling you out when you're incorrect.

No....it is YOU who feels I am incorrect. Just because my opinion differs from yours does not make it incorrect. Your thinking so is the intolerance. It's been noted by others than liberals are tolerant as long as you agree with them. Might be too complex a concept for you.

"Noted by others." That's some solid support there.

How about you back up the notion that the actual mission and leadership of blm are anti-police. Not just pointing some dumb kids who say they're with blm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This anti-cop attitude is now showing up on the grounds of America's most respected military academy:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/08/us/west-point-cadets-photo/

Oh ! You fragile soul, what are you going to about it . This ain't your great grandpa America's anymore . Cry me an ocean

Yes, this America makes excuses for all sorts of ii acceptable behavior. Very unfortunate how far we've fallen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This anti-cop attitude is now showing up on the grounds of America's most respected military academy:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/08/us/west-point-cadets-photo/

Oh ! You fragile soul, what are you going to about it . This ain't your great grandpa America's anymore . Cry me an ocean

Yes, this America makes excuses for all sorts of ii acceptable behavior. Very unfortunate how far we've fallen.

Typo....I meant unacceptable, obviously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Op, you know that black lives matter is NOT anti-police, right?

I support the majority of police who are out there doing the right thing as well as the black lives matter movement that wants to fix the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing.

This is too complex for op and millions of others.

Not too complex. I just disagree. Your "tolerant" liberal attitude is showing.

What intolerance do you see in the above?

Are you suggesting that it is intolerant to be critical of the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing? Are you saying this poster must "tolerate" them? Or do you mean that tolerance requires the poster to agree with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Op, you know that black lives matter is NOT anti-police, right?

I support the majority of police who are out there doing the right thing as well as the black lives matter movement that wants to fix the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing.

This is too complex for op and millions of others.

Not too complex. I just disagree. Your "tolerant" liberal attitude is showing.

What intolerance do you see in the above?

Are you suggesting that it is intolerant to be critical of the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing? Are you saying this poster must "tolerate" them? Or do you mean that tolerance requires the poster to agree with you?

Of course not, although I can see that it's confusing if you look at that single post above. That Republican poster was criticized earlier for calling the cadets "girls" and she admitted that she hesitated using the term, but did so in response to the Democrat poster before her who used the same term. She pointed out that she as a Republican was criticized for the very same thing that the Democrst did. She was just pointing out the hypocrisy, and she got taunted with more criticism. Sort of went downhill from there.

But I do find it interesting how so many Democrats will defend a corrupt liar who put her political ambitions ahead of national security, yet put down a Republican for a minor slip-up (that a Democrat also did).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Op, you know that black lives matter is NOT anti-police, right?

I support the majority of police who are out there doing the right thing as well as the black lives matter movement that wants to fix the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing.

+1. Calling the Black Lives Matter movement "anti-police" does not actually make it so.

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Op, you know that black lives matter is NOT anti-police, right?

I support the majority of police who are out there doing the right thing as well as the black lives matter movement that wants to fix the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing.

This is too complex for op and millions of others.

Not too complex. I just disagree. Your "tolerant" liberal attitude is showing.

What intolerance do you see in the above?

Are you suggesting that it is intolerant to be critical of the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing? Are you saying this poster must "tolerate" them? Or do you mean that tolerance requires the poster to agree with you?

Of course not, although I can see that it's confusing if you look at that single post above. That Republican poster was criticized earlier for calling the cadets "girls" and she admitted that she hesitated using the term, but did so in response to the Democrat poster before her who used the same term. She pointed out that she as a Republican was criticized for the very same thing that the Democrst did. She was just pointing out the hypocrisy, and she got taunted with more criticism. Sort of went downhill from there.

But I do find it interesting how so many Democrats will defend a corrupt liar who put her political ambitions ahead of national security, yet put down a Republican for a minor slip-up (that a Democrat also did).

How do you know the first PP was a Democrat and the second a Republican? All we know is that the first actually cares about accuracy (the charges were entirely dismissed and weren't about BLM anyway). Are you suggesting that only Democrats care about accuracy and telling the full story?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Op, you know that black lives matter is NOT anti-police, right?

I support the majority of police who are out there doing the right thing as well as the black lives matter movement that wants to fix the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing.

This is too complex for op and millions of others.

Not too complex. I just disagree. Your "tolerant" liberal attitude is showing.

What intolerance do you see in the above?

Are you suggesting that it is intolerant to be critical of the minority of cops who are NOT doing the right thing? Are you saying this poster must "tolerate" them? Or do you mean that tolerance requires the poster to agree with you?

Of course not, although I can see that it's confusing if you look at that single post above. That Republican poster was criticized earlier for calling the cadets "girls" and she admitted that she hesitated using the term, but did so in response to the Democrat poster before her who used the same term. She pointed out that she as a Republican was criticized for the very same thing that the Democrst did. She was just pointing out the hypocrisy, and she got taunted with more criticism. Sort of went downhill from there.

But I do find it interesting how so many Democrats will defend a corrupt liar who put her political ambitions ahead of national security, yet put down a Republican for a minor slip-up (that a Democrat also did).

How do you know the first PP was a Democrat and the second a Republican? All we know is that the first actually cares about accuracy (the charges were entirely dismissed and weren't about BLM anyway). Are you suggesting that only Democrats care about accuracy and telling the full story?

Well, the second poster said she was a Republican. But you're right, it's certainly possible that the first PP was a Republican, too.