Well, you can blame Cameron. He's the one who agreed to put it to a vote. This issue should have been decided in parliament. That said, there is enough of a differentiation in the vote count to not warrant it being recounted. |
It's "you're" stupid, and how this will "affect" their future. Just FYI. |
LOL, stupid... |
Yes when one can't put a coherent argument forward you attack the grammar. |
Well why not hold a second referendum?
Or a third? Or as many as it takes to get back under the EU and stop this madness? |
Exactly. If the opposition feels so strongly that the true will of the people has not been captured, organize another referendum. Maybe this first one is a great alarm and wake up call for people to finally discuss frankly what it is they want to see in the future of their country. They need to convey their wants and needs, their worries and fears, and either let their elected representatives act on their behalf, or vote in a new referendum. People who do not engage themselves in the future of their own nation has no position to criticize the outcome as brought about by those who do. |
Re:WHy is no one calling for re-counts of the Brexit vote?
Because they're Brits and not litigious contrarian Americans. |
Well its non-binding.
So the government can just ignore the so-called "result." Problem solved! |
Clearly there were winners and losers in globalization. Apparently a few more losers than winners who voted for Brexit. |