What is Carly fiorina's natural constituency?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?

Who is making fun of her? I'm actually impressed with the way she threw Trump's "face" comment back at him. She's a good actress.

[Anonymous]

Upper-middle-class, educated (read: big donor) republicans. I have a hard time seeing her gain traction with the blue-collar born-again types.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it is mean-looking, pro-business, dishonest (sorry for being redundant), criminal, conservative plutocrats.

Seems like she has a razor thin constituency in a crowded field vying for those same voters.

I don't see the broad appeal needed to win a national election. She couldn't even cut it in a state race in California.

I hope republicans continue to pile chips onto her candidacy. It will be a money black hole.

She wants to chip away at the Hillary votes and break the glass ceiling. She's betting on women who want a woman president, but not another Clinton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is mean-looking, pro-business, dishonest (sorry for being redundant), criminal, conservative plutocrats.

Seems like she has a razor thin constituency in a crowded field vying for those same voters.

I don't see the broad appeal needed to win a national election. She couldn't even cut it in a state race in California.

I hope republicans continue to pile chips onto her candidacy. It will be a money black hole.

She wants to chip away at the Hillary votes and break the glass ceiling. She's betting on women who want a woman president, but not another Clinton.

My bad. Maybe she doesn't realize you need more than 3% of the vote to become president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?

Who is making fun of her? I'm actually impressed with the way she threw Trump's "face" comment back at him. She's a good actress.

I'm just really shocked (not) that the same liberals who scream about women's rights as well as discrimination about looks, sex, and other physical attributes are so quick to participate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think her disastrous tenure at HP hurts her standing with people who actually know anything about business.

She was also the beginning of the end of Lucent Technologies. She helped cook the books and a lot of people lost money, but not her. She left and walked away with a 65million payout just as Lucent's books were opened by the SEC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?

Who is making fun of her? I'm actually impressed with the way she threw Trump's "face" comment back at him. She's a good actress.

I'm just really shocked (not) that the same liberals who scream about women's rights as well as discrimination about looks, sex, and other physical attributes are so quick to participate

Well I never...

Your cloak of self-righteousness must be really tattered from overuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The establishment is using her to undermine Trump.

There is no way that they would want Fiorina as the nominee.

How about VP nominee?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?

Who is making fun of her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?

Who is making fun of her? I'm actually impressed with the way she threw Trump's "face" comment back at him. She's a good actress.

I'm just really shocked (not) that the same liberals who scream about women's rights as well as discrimination about looks, sex, and other physical attributes are so quick to participate

Who are you talking about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?

As far as I'm concerned, with this slate of candidates, the comedy gold just keeps on creating itself!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The establishment is using her to undermine Trump.

There is no way that they would want Fiorina as the nominee.

Bingo. Fiorina is the political equivalent of a suicide bomber. She is simply supposed to take out Trump and make room for someone more acceptable to the establishment. The fact that the mainstream media so completely fell into line should demonstrate to everyone that the mainstream press is neither conservative nor liberal. It is simply a mouthpiece for the ruling class.

Her rise in the press also suggests that many in the MSM are not all that smart.

Huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Upper-middle-class, educated (read: big donor) republicans. I have a hard time seeing her gain traction with the blue-collar born-again types.

Too late. That group is already balls-deep in Jeb! Why do you think he's amassed $100 million. Fiorina is a dilettante.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is mean-looking, pro-business, dishonest (sorry for being redundant), criminal, conservative plutocrats.

Seems like she has a razor thin constituency in a crowded field vying for those same voters.

I don't see the broad appeal needed to win a national election. She couldn't even cut it in a state race in California.

I hope republicans continue to pile chips onto her candidacy. It will be a money black hole.

She wants to chip away at the Hillary votes and break the glass ceiling. She's betting on women who want a woman president, but not another Clinton.

A voter inclined to support HRC won't change her vote because of the drivel spewing from Fiorina. I also don't see much chance of her breaking the glass ceiling when polling at 3 percent. It's delusional.

[Anonymous]

Wealthy Episcopalians don't have enough Jesus Juice in their veins.