Is my bf gay?

[Anonymous]

This isn't about shoes. Your BF is clearly more well-informed than you are. This pope is famous for his humility. Moved into the guest quarters, decided he'd wear the robes, but put his foot down about the fancy red shoes. Wouldn't wear them.

And the fact that you think this means he's gay tells me you're intellectually incompatible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This isn't about shoes. Your BF is clearly more well-informed than you are. This pope is famous for his humility. Moved into the guest quarters, decided he'd wear the robes, but put his foot down about the fancy red shoes. Wouldn't wear them.

And the fact that you think this means he's gay tells me you're intellectually incompatible.

Oh please. Don't be so salty.

Most straight men wouldn't be staring at a guy's shoes and commenting on his wardrobe. OP is right to be concerned.

If awareness of someone's shoe color makes someone well-informed... then I guess Kim Kardashian is the preeminent scholar in the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't about shoes. Your BF is clearly more well-informed than you are. This pope is famous for his humility. Moved into the guest quarters, decided he'd wear the robes, but put his foot down about the fancy red shoes. Wouldn't wear them.

And the fact that you think this means he's gay tells me you're intellectually incompatible.

Oh please. Don't be so salty.

Most straight men wouldn't be staring at a guy's shoes and commenting on his wardrobe. OP is right to be concerned.

If awareness of someone's shoe color makes someone well-informed... then I guess Kim Kardashian is the preeminent scholar in the world.

The BF probably never saw the shoes - he probably read about the pope's new habits and was making what he thought was a witty joke based on his knowledge. This isn't about staring at someone's feet to be the fashion police.

[Anonymous]

It sounds like he was trying to be funny by adopting a stereo-typically gay insight.

I've done the same at times, sarcastically describing something as "fabulous," and I am not gay, nor do I particularly care if people think I am.

It does sound like you two may not be compatible based on your obvious consternation over his willingness to step outside of traditional gender roles to make a joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't about shoes. Your BF is clearly more well-informed than you are. This pope is famous for his humility. Moved into the guest quarters, decided he'd wear the robes, but put his foot down about the fancy red shoes. Wouldn't wear them.

And the fact that you think this means he's gay tells me you're intellectually incompatible.

Oh please. Don't be so salty.

Most straight men wouldn't be staring at a guy's shoes and commenting on his wardrobe. OP is right to be concerned.

If awareness of someone's shoe color makes someone well-informed... then I guess Kim Kardashian is the preeminent scholar in the world.

The BF probably never saw the shoes - he probably read about the pope's new habits and was making what he thought was a witty joke based on his knowledge. This isn't about staring at someone's feet to be the fashion police.

You're make a LOT of guesses....

[Anonymous]

He may not be gay, but he does sound obnoxious. If he was really serious, it is telling he prefers fashion choices to theology--if he is Catholic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Straight men talk all kinds of different ways just like gay men, and also there are more orientations than just gay and straight.

Yes. Way to generalize across multiple populations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't about shoes. Your BF is clearly more well-informed than you are. This pope is famous for his humility. Moved into the guest quarters, decided he'd wear the robes, but put his foot down about the fancy red shoes. Wouldn't wear them.

And the fact that you think this means he's gay tells me you're intellectually incompatible.

Oh please. Don't be so salty.

Most straight men wouldn't be staring at a guy's shoes and commenting on his wardrobe. OP is right to be concerned.

If awareness of someone's shoe color makes someone well-informed... then I guess Kim Kardashian is the preeminent scholar in the world.

It was well known that Prada made the previous pope's shoes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He may not be gay, but he does sound obnoxious. If he was really serious, it is telling he prefers fashion choices to theology--if he is Catholic.

x2

[Anonymous]

Your boyfriend is dumb. Most young people are.

[Anonymous]

Those red shoes were over the top. Even my fashion challenged husband noticed and mentioned them. I don't think that, by itself, should trigger anyone's gaydar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't about shoes. Your BF is clearly more well-informed than you are. This pope is famous for his humility. Moved into the guest quarters, decided he'd wear the robes, but put his foot down about the fancy red shoes. Wouldn't wear them.

And the fact that you think this means he's gay tells me you're intellectually incompatible.

Oh please. Don't be so salty.

Most straight men wouldn't be staring at a guy's shoes and commenting on his wardrobe. OP is right to be concerned.

If awareness of someone's shoe color makes someone well-informed... then I guess Kim Kardashian is the preeminent scholar in the world.

It was well known that Prada made the previous pope's shoes.

Um, by whom? Carson Kressley?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Straight men talk all kinds of different ways just like gay men, and also there are more orientations than just gay and straight.

This is very true. Unfortunately, many don't agree because they haven't gotten around much.

[Anonymous]

OP - Are you male? If so, then your BF is probably gay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't about shoes. Your BF is clearly more well-informed than you are. This pope is famous for his humility. Moved into the guest quarters, decided he'd wear the robes, but put his foot down about the fancy red shoes. Wouldn't wear them.

And the fact that you think this means he's gay tells me you're intellectually incompatible.

Oh please. Don't be so salty.

Most straight men wouldn't be staring at a guy's shoes and commenting on his wardrobe. OP is right to be concerned.

If awareness of someone's shoe color makes someone well-informed... then I guess Kim Kardashian is the preeminent scholar in the world.

It was well known that Prada made the previous pope's shoes.

Um, by whom? Carson Kressley?

Who?