Who applies to GDS? I don't know anyone that applied there?

Anonymous
We applied to Beauvoir but not GDS or Sidwell. My DC has a learning style a lot like mine. I attended a very unstructured school a lot like GDS as a young child and it was absolutely the wrong place for me. It seemed like the wrong place for DC, too. We did not apply DC there. We toured Sidwell expecting to love it. We hated it. We did not apply DC there. We toured Beauvoir expecting too much structure and a lot of stuck up parents. We found the right school for DC instead (and a very warm, welcoming parent community).

It had nothing to do with our social mores and everything to do with DC's learning style and our gut reactions on the tours.
Anonymous
We applied to GDS and Sidwell, but (like you) I don't know anyone else who applied to these places. I'm not sure why that's the case. Maybe it has to do with where you live and how close/far you are from the school?
Anonymous
I didn't see kids yelling and running around during our tours!! And we took two of them. Having decided on GDS for our 9 year old, of course this is worrisome to read. GDS parents: please respond to this.
Anonymous
Who applies to GDS? Apparently LOTS of people you don't know. Big world out there, you know.
Anonymous
I am really laughing for the first time in a long time at a thread about these schools on the private forum. I have foresworn it for the most part but something made me look today.

When we looked at schools, for child #1, we looked at PK at GDS, Beauvoir and St Patricks (not at Sidwell for many reasons). I LOVED so many things about GDS. I loved the calling of teachers by their first names. I loved the school's discussions on and openess about how different families are and how varied the human species is in skin color, sexual preferences, in religion, in style, and so many other ways. These are all things that I want my children to know and understand and accept as "normal" (i.e. just the way it is). The "chaos" and noise and free flowing style of the school, however, was a problem for my child. He is drawn to and prefers quiet and structure in general but esp. when he is trying to learn and concentrate. This was clear about him since a very young age and so it was equally clear that, as much as I loved GDS, it was not the right school for him. So, he is at a school considered more conservative and it is indeed much more structured and has tighter standards of discipline. It is perfect for him. He has thrived. However, we have also made sure that he knows and appreciates the differences in his fellow human beings and the school and many of its families, which you all obviously view as conservative, has reinforced these values... and so, I laugh.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:11:53 here... it seems that kids today are a little less respectful and more entitled. As parents try more reasoning and responsive discipline, it seems that boundaries just don't exist for children and they have a hard time accepting the word NO. What does this have to do with kids calling teachers by their first names? The correlation, at least for me, is that a child should not address an adult in that manner. It just seems disrespectful, to me. As another PP stated, I understand the historic implications of using first names but a child calling Peter Barrett or President Obama or Senator McCain, Peter, Barack or John just doesn't sit well with me. Not passing judgement on others who are ok with it, it's just one of those things that I can't get past.

That said... I don't think my kid would have been worst for the wear at GDS. It is a great, academically rigourous school.


Why not pass judgment? (This is DCUM, after all!) They are breeding an entire generation of disrepectful brats.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:11:53 here... it seems that kids today are a little less respectful and more entitled. As parents try more reasoning and responsive discipline, it seems that boundaries just don't exist for children and they have a hard time accepting the word NO. What does this have to do with kids calling teachers by their first names? The correlation, at least for me, is that a child should not address an adult in that manner. It just seems disrespectful, to me. As another PP stated, I understand the historic implications of using first names but a child calling Peter Barrett or President Obama or Senator McCain, Peter, Barack or John just doesn't sit well with me. Not passing judgement on others who are ok with it, it's just one of those things that I can't get past.

That said... I don't think my kid would have been worst for the wear at GDS. It is a great, academically rigourous school.


Why not pass judgment? (This is DCUM, after all!) They are breeding an entire generation of disrepectful brats.


Really? Have you met every single child there? And they're all disrespectful brats? Interesting. I guess we can expect President Obama's kids to turn out the same way because Sidwell also has children address the teachers by first name according to the information we received. The entire U.S. is doomed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:11:53 here... it seems that kids today are a little less respectful and more entitled. As parents try more reasoning and responsive discipline, it seems that boundaries just don't exist for children and they have a hard time accepting the word NO. What does this have to do with kids calling teachers by their first names? The correlation, at least for me, is that a child should not address an adult in that manner. It just seems disrespectful, to me. As another PP stated, I understand the historic implications of using first names but a child calling Peter Barrett or President Obama or Senator McCain, Peter, Barack or John just doesn't sit well with me. Not passing judgement on others who are ok with it, it's just one of those things that I can't get past.

That said... I don't think my kid would have been worst for the wear at GDS. It is a great, academically rigourous school.


Why not pass judgment? (This is DCUM, after all!) They are breeding an entire generation of disrepectful brats.


Do you know the historical antecedent in why GDS uses first names?
Anonymous
Yes! I know the history. White people called Black people by their first names and Black people had to call white people Mr. or Miss. I get that. GDS wanted to level the playing field by using first names. I must admit that I am simplifying a really important issue but for me... children calling adults by their first names is not about the history.

FWIW I am Black. I applaud GDS for taking that issue head on and creating an environment where everyone is viewed as an equal. As I said, I am just old-fashioned. Sorry!!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yes! I know the history. White people called Black people by their first names and Black people had to call white people Mr. or Miss. I get that. GDS wanted to level the playing field by using first names. I must admit that I am simplifying a really important issue but for me... children calling adults by their first names is not about the history.

FWIW I am Black. I applaud GDS for taking that issue head on and creating an environment where everyone is viewed as an equal. As I said, I am just old-fashioned. Sorry!!!


Okay. I think some folks aren't aware of the underlying reason and make wrongheaded assumptions. Personally, I'm not a fan of it (really contrary to my being!), but think we've devised a system in terms of addressing adults for it to work with our DC for next year and beyond. Something along the lines of what happens with how you address adults at GDS stays at GDS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes! I know the history. White people called Black people by their first names and Black people had to call white people Mr. or Miss. I get that. GDS wanted to level the playing field by using first names. I must admit that I am simplifying a really important issue but for me... children calling adults by their first names is not about the history.

FWIW I am Black. I applaud GDS for taking that issue head on and creating an environment where everyone is viewed as an equal. As I said, I am just old-fashioned. Sorry!!!


Okay. I think some folks aren't aware of the underlying reason and make wrongheaded assumptions. Personally, I'm not a fan of it (really contrary to my being!), but think we've devised a system in terms of addressing adults for it to work with our DC for next year and beyond. Something along the lines of what happens with how you address adults at GDS stays at GDS.

For the record, if GDS was the only school to which we were accepted I would have enrolled my kid in a heartbeat. Like you, I would have done the same with regard to addressing adults at school and outside of school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yes! I know the history. White people called Black people by their first names and Black people had to call white people Mr. or Miss. I get that. GDS wanted to level the playing field by using first names. I must admit that I am simplifying a really important issue but for me... children calling adults by their first names is not about the history.

FWIW I am Black. I applaud GDS for taking that issue head on and creating an environment where everyone is viewed as an equal. As I said, I am just old-fashioned. Sorry!!!


I wasn't aware of the history, also applaud GDS on both counts. It is my preference that my children address adults by title and name, i.e., Mr/Mrs/Ms/Miss/Dr/Rev/Coach/Aunt/Uncle/Mom/Dad, etc.

The black adults that this ugly bit of history addresses weren't children. Can't say that I agree that children should be considered on the same level as adults emotionally, physically, mentally, etc.



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes! I know the history. White people called Black people by their first names and Black people had to call white people Mr. or Miss. I get that. GDS wanted to level the playing field by using first names. I must admit that I am simplifying a really important issue but for me... children calling adults by their first names is not about the history.

FWIW I am Black. I applaud GDS for taking that issue head on and creating an environment where everyone is viewed as an equal. As I said, I am just old-fashioned. Sorry!!!


I wasn't aware of the history, also applaud GDS on both counts. It is my preference that my children address adults by title and name, i.e., Mr/Mrs/Ms/Miss/Dr/Rev/Coach/Aunt/Uncle/Mom/Dad, etc.

The black adults that this ugly bit of history addresses weren't children. Can't say that I agree that children should be considered on the same level as adults emotionally, physically, mentally, etc.

Yes, your point has merit. But this was the 1940s. And blacks and Jews were excluded from many independent educational institutions in the metro area. I can see why they made that decision.



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes! I know the history. White people called Black people by their first names and Black people had to call white people Mr. or Miss. I get that. GDS wanted to level the playing field by using first names. I must admit that I am simplifying a really important issue but for me... children calling adults by their first names is not about the history.

FWIW I am Black. I applaud GDS for taking that issue head on and creating an environment where everyone is viewed as an equal. As I said, I am just old-fashioned. Sorry!!!


I wasn't aware of the history, also applaud GDS on both counts. It is my preference that my children address adults by title and name, i.e., Mr/Mrs/Ms/Miss/Dr/Rev/Coach/Aunt/Uncle/Mom/Dad, etc.

The black adults that this ugly bit of history addresses weren't children. Can't say that I agree that children should be considered on the same level as adults emotionally, physically, mentally, etc.

Yes, your point has merit. But this was the 1940s. And blacks and Jews were excluded from many independent educational institutions in the metro area. I can see why they made that decision.






Actually, my very dark-complexioned, sharecropping grandparents who migrated to the DC area from South Carolina prior to this period experienced the entire array of exclusionary practices, in place, in this town. Their preference is, also, that children address adults by title.

I suppose, it's a cultural/regional preference.

Anonymous
I don't have children at GDS, but the whole "calling teachers
by their first names breeds disrespectful kids" does not
ring true; at least to me. I totally understand a cultural
or familial preference for the use of titles. That said, I grew
up calling all my parents' friends by their first names
and only in retrospect did I realize this was unusual.
Rather than cause any disrespect, the kids I grew up
with were all very close to our friends' parents and it
continues to this day. The preschool my children
attended also had a first name policy. Again, there was
no disrespect or academic laxness noted. There are many
ways to teach our children good values but equating use
of first names with a denigrating society seems a little
silly.
Forum Index » Private & Independent Schools
Go to: