Well that's a relief, since the program services, the teachers, and the kids are the only parts that concern me. Parents I can ignore, especially the ones who visit the AAP forums just to call us assholes. Sheesh, if you want to dismantle gifted programs in Virginia take it up with the state. http://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/gifted_ed/ |
Parents are indeed a part of the problem, but the program services are also a huge part of the problem. The disparity between Level III and Level IV services is huge in many cases--one hour of pull out to do "interesting" projects vs. full time advanced instruction. For kids who are score in the mid nineties on the CogAT and NNAT, it just seems like a huge disparity. That's why you see so many parents parent refer and appeal. But I'm sure you think those services are fine
|
The Virginia standards aren't the problem, FCPS's implementation of the standards is the problem. Do you really think AAP as implemented is a gifted program? That is laughable. |
Level III at our school is one hour of pull-out with the AART twice a week for math and a separate pull-out for LA. |
This misses the point. If the FCPS implementation violates regulations why merely complain to AAP parents or even the county. Take your case to those who enforce the regs. |
You miss the point of a "discussion forum." |
| Pretty sure offering advice about how to best address a grievance constitutes discussion. Arguing ad nauseum that "AAP is not a gifted program" less so. |
+100 |
When you do a +100, do you think that makes your agreement 100 times more important than someone who only does a +1? |
-100 Equilibrium achieved. |
That is so hard to say. There are way more perks - like more field trips, resources, etc. You definitely notice that you are treated on a superior level to the "base" kids. It can give one a bit of an ego - which is NOT a good thing. Many of the extremely smart kids were somewhere on the spectrum and really needed AAP. Those kids generally ended up going to TJ followed by an Ivy and later entered the tech industry - usually as a tech architect or programmer, or they went on become doctors. The other kids were very smart but, in my opinion, not necessarily smarter than the "base" kids. I became very good friends with some of the base kids when we entered high school (as I didn't make it into TJ) and many of the base kids ended up going on to really prestigious universities and have done extremely well for themselves professionally - lawyers, doctors, some are even celebrities. Overall, the positives - you are around only intelligent kids and you are exposed to a very intense and fulfilling curriculum. Negatives - if you are not a math genius, then you will feel very intimidated in the program . . yet outside of the program, because you are AAP, you feel a bit superior (don't know if that makes sense) Out of my three kids, only one could hack it. Not sure if I would send him though since he is only in 1st grade. Hope this helps. |
+1 |
Not the PP, but when I do +100, it means I agree vehemently with the previous post. What a weird question. Who cares what the number is? It's a form of agreement.
|
You haven't described AAP. This is a description of GT from years ago. |
Want to put out that every single field trip my DC took has been with the whole grade. No AAP-only trips. |