I attended Wellesley and hated being at a girls-only college, so I transferred to Amherst. Big difference, but I loved Amherst. So, I would put Smith and Wellesley at the bottom of the list.
Social: Vandy, but only if she wants to be in the south and likes Greek life. I know a wonderful kid who just graduated from Pomona. She's a big tennis player, and a super-brainy, very well-adjusted, social kid. She loved Pomona. If it were me, I'd choose Barnard because it's in NYC. It's a women's college, but it's so closely tied to Columbia that it might as well be co-ed. What's not to like about NYC? It's a huge playground for a kid in college -- she can be anything she wants to be at Barnard! Hopkins? Not social, not athletic, pretty nerdy, intense, academically-oriented school, but there are some kids who are all of these things and social. They do have a lot of sports, it's just not Hopkins' emphasis. Very urban, just doesn't seem like a fun school. |
Hopkins has really strong departments outside the sciences as well. And small classes.
Depending on academic interests and sport/level of commitment to it, it could be a good fit. I knew some smart kids on teams who might not have pulled that off (or wanted to try) at a different school where academics were more cutthroat or athletics were more intense. None of these kids were pre-med. That part of JHU did seem to be as cutthroat as it gets. I was in a social science and mostly knew kids in that field or some type of humanities. |
Do you actually know anything about Pomona...? Claremont, CA isn't is far from the middle of the desert |
Pomona hands down. Wonderful beautiful campus, great academics, unbeatable weather. Most selective SLAC in the country at less than 10% admission rate (versus 16% for Williams e.g.). Go visit.
|
+1 |