"At risk"? Seriously?
|
If AAP's curriculum is faster, more in depth and compacted, frankly AAP should be cherry picking those that are already successful. |
Yes. I posted that and it is very true in our family's case. I have several highly and profoundly gifted people in my extended family. My AAP child is highly gifted. I know from first hand experience and also from research that the adult life of the highly and profoundly gifted is often a struggle. The AAP teachers my kid had with rare exception got those types of kids and did a wonderful job teaching the extremes. |
Says every single parent of an AAP child.
|
Since you know so much about highly and profoundly gifted children, would you share some resources for underachieving students, please? Thank you. |
Pardon? |
Look at the research. The prognosis for the highly gifted is just as likely to be the adult living in his mom's basement unable to hold down a job than it is likely to be the person that cures cancer. Being highly or profoundly gifted is not what you think it is and if you knew adults who are highly gifted you would know that they are indeed an at risk population. You eye rolls just shows your ignorance. |
|
|
|
It would be interesting to see data for 3rd grade since that's the first year of the AAP/Gen Ed split.
Do all AAP kids in 3rd grade pass advanced on the SOLs? |
Of course not.
|
Why not? |
Because most do and not all do. |
And what have they aacomplished in life that reflects their "PROFOUND/Highly" giftedness? Geniuses write symphonies at young ages or win Nobel prizes etc. They don't just score at the 99.9 percentile on some IQ test. |
Are you thinking that only "geniuses" can be considered "gifted"? |