Yes, not more valuable in an absolute sense -- we are all just as valuable as human beings. However, in terms of workplace capital, you bet that the senior employee generally is more valuable. Simple economics. |
Really mature. What is this, middle school?
|
Yes, for some immature old colleagues. |
I posted earlier in this thread. I'm neither 25 or 55, and am director-level. It would be great if our VP-level staff would actually read a three-sentence email thoroughly before responding with a question that is answered in the first line of said email. I'm sure their time is "more valuable" than anyone's, yet they waste an inordinate amount of everyone's time (and their own!) by being "too important" for just about everything. Not accusing you of doing this. Just more of a general observation/rant.
|
| I think the OP would be in for a rude awakening if she worked at a company where seniority by longevity wasn't the norm. That 25 year old could then be your boss within five years. After a basic threshold, age and experience are not necessarily conducive to results and effectiveness. |
WOW OP you are a total bitch. Its very clear from your nasty responses that you think you are entitled to treat subordinates like trash. I hope HR comes after your ass one day. Karma! |
No, it's a use of a good resource. If you don't think of yourself as a good resource for a younger colleague, you're a sourpuss and need to get over yourself. It doesn't do anyone any good to resource horde. Of course, if it's something the employee has specifically been given or shown how to do, that's different. I'm the lowest on the totem pole and people ask me to find things ALL the time that are public information. They sometimes go, "wow, that was fast!" yes, it is the most recent press release on the Senator's web site, but since you're too old to know how the internet works (or you're on a powertrip and like tasking people), you had me find it. In the time it took you to tell me what you were looking for, old person, you could have already had it. it works both ways! |
WTH not? 4 is too late for a meeting? Do you work for the federal govt or something? Our workday is 8 until 6:30 or 7. Can't imagine not having meetings at or after 4 pm. |
Mental acuity starts declining at 40. Also, tech companies tend to be on the young side. And I've read that ageism is rampant in Mexico-you're considered old by the time you're in your late twenties. |
OP here. I'm senior because I know my stuff and because I'm effective. Oh, and let me add: you want to meet with, you check my Outlook calendar and invite me. Why should I be your secretary? |
They're not subordinates, just more junior colleagues. |
Ha yeah at being a BITCH! |
No, in the private sector. Sucks for you though. No 11-hour days required here! |
Don't work for a tech company, and my mental acuity is just fine, thanks. |
I get paid well to work those hours. Doesn't suck for me. |