RNC unanimously rejects 21st century

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aw, I thought it was funny.

I can't believe people against gay marriage can't see how regressive and evil they are going to look in 50 years. Seriously, this is our generation's civil rights movement. Shame on them.

So not legislating gay marriage on a Federal level is evil?

No, the Constitution does not give Congress that power. But the Court has the power to declare it a protected right.

If they don't, is it evil?

Not evil, just bound in the past.

Who says embracing homosexuality is the future?

Embracing equality, embracing accepting people for they way they are, is the future. You can close your eyes, you can remain ignorant and stuck in your antiquated ideas, but the rest of us will progress forward.

[Anonymous]

Isn't judging people for having differing views the same thing? Who deems these views antiquated? Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn't judging people for having differing views the same thing? Who deems these views antiquated? Why?

Who's forcing you to get gay married, or taking away your right to do as you please for your own self.

Not, it's not even remotely the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Embracing equality, embracing accepting people for they way they are, is the future. You can close your eyes, you can remain ignorant and stuck in your antiquated ideas, but the rest of us will progress forward.

This. I am a fairly conservative Christian Catholic. I believe in the sanctity of marriage. I believe that marriage should be between two people and barring infidelity or abuse should be forever.

That said, I don't see the logic in telling people whom they can marry. Do people really think it's ok to tell two consenting adults how they must love each other? That's messed up beyond measure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn't judging people for having differing views the same thing? Who deems these views antiquated? Why?

You basically said "why won't you tolerate my intolerance?"

Having a different "view" is one thing. When that "view" denies rights to a group of people then it's discrimination. You might think it is biblical discrimination, or historically consistent discrimination. But it is discrimination.

[Anonymous]

If Christ returns in the 21st century..... The roles are reversed!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't judging people for having differing views the same thing? Who deems these views antiquated? Why?

You basically said "why won't you tolerate my intolerance?"

Having a different "view" is one thing. When that "view" denies rights to a group of people then it's discrimination. You might think it is biblical discrimination, or historically consistent discrimination. But it is discrimination.

Who is denying homosexuals to have a heterosexual marriage?

[Anonymous]

Homosexuals are trying to force religious people to accommodate and elevate sin . So evil like sodom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't judging people for having differing views the same thing? Who deems these views antiquated? Why?

You basically said "why won't you tolerate my intolerance?"

Having a different "view" is one thing. When that "view" denies rights to a group of people then it's discrimination. You might think it is biblical discrimination, or historically consistent discrimination. But it is discrimination.

Who is denying homosexuals to have a heterosexual marriage?

You're denying people the right to marry the person they love.

Who's forcing you to only have the option to marry someone you don't love?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Homosexuals are trying to force religious people to accommodate and elevate sin . So evil like sodom.

Go to Saudi Arabia if you want a theocracy. In the United States, we don't discriminate based on your personal religion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Homosexuals are trying to force religious people to accommodate and elevate sin . So evil like sodom.

Mythology is for children. Adults know that real life doesn't fit into an old story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Embracing equality, embracing accepting people for they way they are, is the future. You can close your eyes, you can remain ignorant and stuck in your antiquated ideas, but the rest of us will progress forward.

This. I am a fairly conservative Christian Catholic. I believe in the sanctity of marriage. I believe that marriage should be between two people and barring infidelity or abuse should be forever.

That said, I don't see the logic in telling people whom they can marry. Do people really think it's ok to tell two consenting adults how they must love each other? That's messed up beyond measure.

These are great pictures, thank you for sharing. And thanks for your comment. I don't understand what's so difficult about side-by-side having your own personal beliefs, but understand that others are also entitled to their right to live according to THEIR own beliefs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homosexuals are trying to force religious people to accommodate and elevate sin . So evil like sodom.

Mythology is for children. Adults know that real life doesn't fit into an old story.

Lol... Our entire legal system is based on that "mythology"...that's what makes you stupid. Without that "mythology" what logic makes you any better than Hitler?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homosexuals are trying to force religious people to accommodate and elevate sin . So evil like sodom.

Mythology is for children. Adults know that real life doesn't fit into an old story.

Lol... Our entire legal system is based on that "mythology"...that's what makes you stupid. Without that "mythology" what logic makes you any better than Hitler?

No. Our legal system is based on political theory. Read your Locke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homosexuals are trying to force religious people to accommodate and elevate sin . So evil like sodom.

Go to Saudi Arabia if you want a theocracy. In the United States, we don't discriminate based on your personal religion.

Exactly...but it's legal to discriminate against behavior ( lifestyle based on sodomy)