Tell me why you are voting for Romney

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't divide America, doesn't have a distaste for success and supports an agenda that encourages investment and risk, rather than send signals of uncertainty and defeated leadership.

Huh. You must have slept through that whole 'half the people in this country are moochers' thing.

I'm pretty sure no one is certain what Mitt Romney will do since, well, he hasn't told us. He certainly creates a lot of uncertainty in foreign policy.

You think Obama has defeated leadership? By what measure? He's leading and winning the polls and he will win by a landslide in November.

Don't be stupid. Sadly for you, a lot of people are aware that what he meant was Obama's got 47% committed, which he can't worry about electorally

No, what he said and what he MEANT was that he can't ever convince these people to care more about their lives. That's what he says.

He is a despicable human being for that. How dare he insult Americans. Most people have been in the 47% at one point or another. No self-respecting Republican would vote for someone who said such a terrible, disrespectful, and unAmerican thing.

Most people have been in the 47%...starting with his own FATHER, who grew up on welfare.
He is nothing but an entitled, poor little rich boy who's apparently forgotten his origins (other than to claim that he's not dark enough as Mexicans go to get elected). Ugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There have been a couple of recent threads along these lines, sorta "tell me why you think the earth is flat gee I'm genuinely interested." When a thoughtful conservative takes the bait, they get pounded.

I'll ask a different question.

Tell me, Dems, why you think your party's policies will provide a better life for your kids? Please answer from this perspective: every dollar you spend is borrowed from abroad and will need to be repaid with interest.

And you think your party is going to fix that? Bwahhahahahahaha.

This reckless level of indebtedness started with Reagan's tax cuts and was furthered by W.'s wars and additional tax cuts as well as Greenspan's policies (I grant you you had one responsible Republican president in the interim, which is probably why he didn't get re-elected).

[Anonymous]

I am not voting for Romney, but I know several people who are and we have engaged in some very polite but in-depth conversations about it. Here are some reasons (not validating, just parroting for interest):

- Obamacare has "caused" their insurance company to up their insurance rates over 5xs because they can no longer exclude a pending procedure for one of their kids. Romney said he would get rid of it so there you go (pretty sure they would have voted for him anyway).

- Belief that Obama participates in Keynesian economics and that the system is a bad one. Belief that government is overregulated and that Romney will scale it back.

- Owns own business and thinks taxes are too high and wants to lower them. Thinks Romney is the better candidate to lower taxes for independent business owners.

[Anonymous]

PP: Thanks for your clear response.

However, there is an elephant in the room.
Obama has tried to get all political persuasions to the table to openly discuss issues. Republicans have refused.
Voting for a President because of one self-serving issue is like picking a beautiful necklace to wear and ignoring the issue of wearing clothes.
The world knows you're Republican and others think you are living under a rock with a bunch of pretty necklaces and no clothes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I dont believe large government stimulas and jobs will help the economy. I believe low taxes and private sector growth is what america needs and is in line with the americsn dream of capitalism.

Since when is the American dream capitalism? Is it in the Declaration of Independence? The Constitution? Even the Federalist papers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't divide America, doesn't have a distaste for success and supports an agenda that encourages investment and risk, rather than send signals of uncertainty and defeated leadership.

Huh. You must have slept through that whole 'half the people in this country are moochers' thing.

I'm pretty sure no one is certain what Mitt Romney will do since, well, he hasn't told us. He certainly creates a lot of uncertainty in foreign policy.

You think Obama has defeated leadership? By what measure? He's leading and winning the polls and he will win by a landslide in November.

Don't be stupid. Sadly for you, a lot of people are aware that what he meant was Obama's got 47% committed, which he can't worry about electorally

Yeah, well, your candidate just learned a tough lesson that what you say and how you say it matters, whether you think it is private or not. You are running for President - NOTHING YOU SAY IS PRIVATE OR OFF THE RECORD. Boo fucking hoo. Face it, he's not ready for prime time. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are trying to vote both in Florida and Virginia? FRAUD!

Oh wait, you're probably white, so the Republicans won't care.

Racist

No, this person is correctly pointing out the absolute HYPOCRISY of this PP and has no doubt quite accurately assessed the situation.

Signed, someone who is so white I practically glow in the dark.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tell the truth, it's because you went to BYU.

And your contribution is what other than what you leave in the toilet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm voting for Romney for President .... of the Caymans!

1. That is your score out of 10 for attempts at humor. You can do it! Do 't make me wait for SNL! Work harder!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't divide America, doesn't have a distaste for success and supports an agenda that encourages investment and risk, rather than send signals of uncertainty and defeated leadership.

Huh. You must have slept through that whole 'half the people in this country are moochers' thing.

I'm pretty sure no one is certain what Mitt Romney will do since, well, he hasn't told us. He certainly creates a lot of uncertainty in foreign policy.

You think Obama has defeated leadership? By what measure? He's leading and winning the polls and he will win by a landslide in November.

Don't be stupid. Sadly for you, a lot of people are aware that what he meant was Obama's got 47% committed, which he can't worry about electorally

No, what he said and what he MEANT was that he can't ever convince these people to care more about their lives. That's what he says.

He is a despicable human being for that. How dare he insult Americans. Most people have been in the 47% at one point or another. No self-respecting Republican would vote for someone who said such a terrible, disrespectful, and unAmerican thing.

Most people have been in the 47%...starting with his own FATHER, who grew up on welfare.
He is nothing but an entitled, poor little rich boy who's apparently forgotten his origins (other than to claim that he's not dark enough as Mexicans go to get elected). Ugh.

The emboldened quote reminds me of a joke:

"There are three kinds of people; those who are good at math and those who aren't. I am not."

[Anonymous]

The 47% isn't one solid, unchanging group, genius. People access government services when they need them -- until they hit 65 and tap Medicare and Social Security. Then we're all in the 47%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The 47% isn't one solid, unchanging group, genius. People access government services when they need them -- until they hit 65 and tap Medicare and Social Security. Then we're all in the 47%.

Who are you talking to genius? And once again, he was referring to the 47% committed to voting once again for the Hope and Change....not the lies that you continue to spew.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are trying to vote both in Florida and Virginia? FRAUD!

Oh wait, you're probably white, so the Republicans won't care.

Racist

No, this person is correctly pointing out the absolute HYPOCRISY of this PP and has no doubt quite accurately assessed the situation.

Signed, someone who is so white I practically glow in the dark.

Being the PP, I'd say I was being ironic, maybe I should have said MD and FL, like the former MD candidate for Congress, but since VA is in play, I used that.

You're slow, and you're racist, I'm colorblind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 47% isn't one solid, unchanging group, genius. People access government services when they need them -- until they hit 65 and tap Medicare and Social Security. Then we're all in the 47%.

Who are you talking to genius? And once again, he was referring to the 47% committed to voting once again for the Hope and Change....not the lies that you continue to spew.

Except that's not actually what he said.

[Anonymous]

This is not an answer to the original question, since I will not be voting for Romney. But since this is the latest thread about Romney, here is an interesting article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/27/mitt-romney-sensata-tax-break_n_1920396.html?utm_hp_ref=politics. HuffPost is a liberal site, so I don't claim this is a balanced article, but the facts seem pretty straightforward.