hillary pelted by shoes and tomatoes....chants of "monica, monica" lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the world hated Bush? lol. nice going B O.

Don't worry, it does.

You do realize that the protesters are there because we have not sufficiently supported the government run by the Muslim Brotherhood. So can I assume this is what you also want? Or have you gone so far into bizzaro land that you would rather support Islamist resurgence than Hillary Clinton.

Anway, don't worry. Hillary is badass.

Actually, it was the liberals who think we are fully supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. They sure have gotten cozy over here lately.

Not that I'm excusing Egyptian behavior. It's horrifying and sexist. To chant about a Secretary of State's husband's behavior? Shameful.

What can you expect from a county that's 90% Muslim? There aren't many women running errands in shorts!

Not fair and you know it. This has nothing to do with religion; in fact many of those protesting are secular.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Sad that Republicans can never beat her.

[Anonymous]

Bad breath and fromunda cheese has taken her into a sexless oblivion covered in shoes, tomatoes and stained dresses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bad breath and fromunda cheese has taken her into a sexless oblivion covered in shoes, tomatoes and stained dresses.

Go away freak.

[Anonymous]

Muslims do not want a woman telling them that the islamic president they elected is a shauvinist

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the world hated Bush? lol. nice going B O.

Don't worry, it does.

You do realize that the protesters are there because we have not sufficiently supported the government run by the Muslim Brotherhood. So can I assume this is what you also want? Or have you gone so far into bizzaro land that you would rather support Islamist resurgence than Hillary Clinton.

Anway, don't worry. Hillary is badass.

Actually, it was the liberals who think we are fully supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. They sure have gotten cozy over here lately.

Not that I'm excusing Egyptian behavior. It's horrifying and sexist. To chant about a Secretary of State's husband's behavior? Shameful.

What can you expect from a county that's 90% Muslim? There aren't many women running errands in shorts!

Not fair and you know it. This has nothing to do with religion; in fact many of those protesting are secular.

That doesn't really change the culture, as the majority are still Muslim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the world hated Bush? lol. nice going B O.

Don't worry, it does.

You do realize that the protesters are there because we have not sufficiently supported the government run by the Muslim Brotherhood. So can I assume this is what you also want? Or have you gone so far into bizzaro land that you would rather support Islamist resurgence than Hillary Clinton.

Anway, don't worry. Hillary is badass.

Actually, it was the liberals who think we are fully supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. They sure have gotten cozy over here lately.

Not that I'm excusing Egyptian behavior. It's horrifying and sexist. To chant about a Secretary of State's husband's behavior? Shameful.

What can you expect from a county that's 90% Muslim? There aren't many women running errands in shorts!

Not fair and you know it. This has nothing to do with religion; in fact many of those protesting are secular.

That doesn't really change the culture, as the majority are still Muslim.

Of course you are right. Muslim culture is monolithic across the globe. No variation anywhere.

[Anonymous]

Perhaps the true message is that the US should stop interfering in other people's business. Many people around the world are wondering why America doesn't put its own house in order before intervening in foreign affairs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps the true message is that the US should stop interfering in other people's business. Many people around the world are wondering why America doesn't put its own house in order before intervening in foreign affairs.

Do you mean stop giving financial help as well?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps the true message is that the US should stop interfering in other people's business. Many people around the world are wondering why America doesn't put its own house in order before intervening in foreign affairs.

Do you mean stop giving financial help as well?

NP here.


YES. Our $50 billion in aid does not give us carte blanche to launch trillion dollar wars. Of that money, $15 billion is military support (like the 5 billion to Israel and Egypt), not exactly charitable giving. Another 7 billion is security assistance. 3 billion for the war on drugs. 1 billion anti-terrorism, 2 billion yet another defense program. It goes on and on. So basically more than half is another form of US defense spending anyway.

When it comes to real charitable giving, how do we rank as a country? As you can see from this Gates Foundation graph, we are one of the LEAST generous countries when you adjust for size:




The world can get along without 25 billion of aid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps the true message is that the US should stop interfering in other people's business. Many people around the world are wondering why America doesn't put its own house in order before intervening in foreign affairs.

Do you mean stop giving financial help as well?

NP here.


YES. Our $50 billion in aid does not give us carte blanche to launch trillion dollar wars. Of that money, $15 billion is military support (like the 5 billion to Israel and Egypt), not exactly charitable giving. Another 7 billion is security assistance. 3 billion for the war on drugs. 1 billion anti-terrorism, 2 billion yet another defense program. It goes on and on. So basically more than half is another form of US defense spending anyway.

When it comes to real charitable giving, how do we rank as a country? As you can see from this Gates Foundation graph, we are one of the LEAST generous countries when you adjust for size:




The world can get along without 25 billion of aid.

. Our country with its historical minimization of government has become so great , free , powerful and wealthy that a smaller percentage is more than all those socialist countries put together. Don't forget to add in what united states citizens give to private charity, because the socialist governments have taxed away the ability to choose personal charity(how evil) .It really exposes what a failure socialism is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bad breath and fromunda cheese has taken her into a sexless oblivion covered in shoes, tomatoes and stained dresses.

I never thought of it that way. It's sad how sometimes reality can be so sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

It's sad how Hillary still calls Bill "my husband" I don't think I've ever heard him call her "my wife". I feel sorry for her sitting in that crumpled pant- suit wanting so desparately to truly ( not made up , fake liberal b s ) be respected and actually loved. It's a show.