|
My paternal side of the family is full of brilliance and they are also full of MAJOR mental health issues, I'm talking hospitalizations here and pure mental anguish. It is amazing that with such raw brilliance comes this horrible pox of mental health problems. So, all in all, I really hope that my kids are a tick above average, IMO, being slightly above average is the ideal. I'll echo other posters, I think it is a crap-shoot (except on my paternal side there is clearly a genetic component). |
| I think it goes way beyond parents. For instance, my in laws have 8 grandkids between them. My FIL is crazy smart in a traditional way- former engineer, can solve any problem, just all around extremely intelligent. My MIL grew up on a farm and didn't get great schooling and had kids starting at 19. She is smart in different ways- she's tough and resourceful and nobody gets the better of her. I'd say she's "clever" vs. book smart if that makes sense. Anyway, of the 8 grandkids, only one is what I would call highly intelligent. There's one or two that are just... not that smart. They're kind, they're good kids, but they're never going to be more than average in terms of smarts. And they will have to really WORK for grades as they get older, you can tell. The rest are somewhere in between. Our child is the youngest (2) and I can't tell yet how she'll fall in the spectrum. I think DH and I are both above average in terms of intelligence, but not geniuses. And my dad is very, very smart, but my mom is pretty average. It's like any other thing they inherit- total crapshoot. |
|
| Both of us are very smart in different ways. I'm a lefty and believe that contributes different IQ factors due to using both hemispheres differently. One DC (also a lefty) has my brain, while the other DC has the best from both of us and is off the charts smart but not a great tester and probably a bit ADHD because so much is going on up there in that brain - that DC also has a physically big head. I agree with PPs that being mentally healthy beats super high IQ any day. |
|
DH is wicked smart in some ways and in some ways not (smart- history, literature. not smart- math, science). I am wicked smart in some ways and in some ways not (smart- math, science. not smart- humanities). DC1 is really really good at math. Pretty good at history. But not so great at reading and art stuff. DC2 is really really good reader and is a great artist. He struggles with math though. And he is pretty average/ above average at history, geography.
I think it's all a mix. It is pretty rare for someone to be a genius at art, math, science, history, literature, etc. Each child may be smart at certain areas and challenged at others. And that;s a good thing I think. |
|
I'm probably of average to above average intelligence. My husband is very smart. 4.0 in undergraduate chemical engineering, #1 in his class at a top 3 medical school. Now a very successful sub specialist physician.
Our kids (6, 6, 3) appear to be totally average. Or at least the NW DC form of average---bright, curious, well-spoken, personable and certainly advantaged. But they're not prodigies. |
OP, Where are you from? I can only remember hearing the word wicked from my high school students during the 90s. wicked! LOL! love it!!! My husband is sort of wicked smart, btw. |
|
Intelligence has actually been linked to being passed through the mother's side.
My husband's best friend grew up in a wealthy area with many brilliant men married to dumb trophy wives. His mother took him aside when he was a preteen/teen and told him to be sure to marry a smart woman. She said 'take a good look around at your friends...do they seem particularly smart? (His friends were all very dumb jocks) 'now look at their mothers'. His own mom worked in NYC as an executive. His friends mothers were the "Mrs." degree or some fluffy liberal arts that they never planned on using. He did take her advice eventually. After watching him date a bevy of bimbos--he finally settled down with a smart cookie in his late 30s. |
| 16:26 has a point. |
I'm not going to tell my children they must marry smart but I am going to tell them that you should consider someone's genetic pool before having children with them. |
My dad has always said this as well. He always pointed to my grandmother (his mom, who was a super-smart lady and even went to college, back in the 40s, and majored in math, and then was a hs math teacher for a few years before she got married and had to quit per the time and b/c she went on to have many children). Anyway, he pointed to his mom and said, "She's the reason why all of us have done so well. By having a college-educated mom, she pushed us, and taught us things, and guided us in what we should be doing, not doing, etc." So, this is a more "sociological" angle than the genetic angle I know we all have been discussing, but it is good reason to have a smart wife . Hope all this makes sense.
|
| So this a corollary to George Elliot's idea that ugly rich men whose privilege purchases pretty wives still risk having plain daughters who may take after their own sorry asses. (She didn't say it like that, naturally.) |
Funny generational thing, since here's my version of the same story: The joke among me and my friends was that our dads married smart the first time (to ensure smart babies) and then remarried for looks and ego-salving. Sometimes they had kids the second time around and we could all run circles around them. |