How do you start a Super PAC? Can we start one in favor of Women's rights?

[Anonymous]

Please republican women will fall in line behind their men. Santorum got like 47% of the women vote.

[Anonymous]

OP here. Sorry, I posted and then didn't come back for a couple of days. I typed neo-conservative (lower case), but forgot that it had meaning as a proper noun. I really meant those staunch conservatives that are throwing women under the bus.

As for PP and NOW, they don't really fit the quick strike, SOB kind of advertising that a PAC seems to be able to pull off. They have other agendas. I'd really like to fund someone who will put together "swift boat" type ads agains the anti-woman candidates like Santorum across the country at all levels of government. PP and NOW won't do it, for whatever reasons.

I am glad to see there are organizations like womens strikeforce and the waronwomen march taking this on.

[Anonymous]

OP, that is really interesting. Please keep us posted. I'd love to get involved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here. Sorry, I posted and then didn't come back for a couple of days. I typed neo-conservative (lower case), but forgot that it had meaning as a proper noun. I really meant those staunch conservatives that are throwing women under the bus.

As for PP and NOW, they don't really fit the quick strike, SOB kind of advertising that a PAC seems to be able to pull off. They have other agendas. I'd really like to fund someone who will put together "swift boat" type ads agains the anti-woman candidates like Santorum across the country at all levels of government. PP and NOW won't do it, for whatever reasons.

I am glad to see there are organizations like womens strikeforce and the waronwomen march taking this on.

Actually, the "War on women" is concocted by the Obama administration and the media to get votes. It's a bunch of BS, and I suggest you do your homework. The "war", if anything, is against boys/men in this country, who are discriminated against in employment, family court, and criminal court. Women now go to college more, make more money before marriage, and can take a man's car, house, and kids on a whim. But glad to see your cluelessness come out.

I hope you don't have a husband or son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. Sorry, I posted and then didn't come back for a couple of days. I typed neo-conservative (lower case), but forgot that it had meaning as a proper noun. I really meant those staunch conservatives that are throwing women under the bus.

As for PP and NOW, they don't really fit the quick strike, SOB kind of advertising that a PAC seems to be able to pull off. They have other agendas. I'd really like to fund someone who will put together "swift boat" type ads agains the anti-woman candidates like Santorum across the country at all levels of government. PP and NOW won't do it, for whatever reasons.

I am glad to see there are organizations like womens strikeforce and the waronwomen march taking this on.

Actually, the "War on women" is concocted by the Obama administration and the media to get votes. It's a bunch of BS, and I suggest you do your homework. The "war", if anything, is against boys/men in this country, who are discriminated against in employment, family court, and criminal court. Women now go to college more, make more money before marriage, and can take a man's car, house, and kids on a whim. But glad to see your cluelessness come out.

I hope you don't have a husband or son.

Oh wait, maybe all those recent abortion laws didn't actually pass. And maybe conservatives didn't pressure Susan G Komen to de-fund PP. And maybe the Republicans didn't pass a law to prevent DC from using ITS OWN money to pay for abortion services. And maybe they didn't try to deny PP federal funding not even used for abortion services.

As a man I find your claim that men are oppressed to be laughable and pathetic. Sorry if some woman took you to the cleaners, but from the way you talk, I'm not surprised.