An older woman just shushed by 3 year old at the Winnie The Pooh movie

[Anonymous]

I thought OP said the annoying woman in the Pooh shirt was singing along and a 3 year old shushed her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh my god, people. did you not read the original post at all. the older woman was wearing a pooh shirt and making noise herself, so OP is wondering why she had the nerve to shush the perfectly normal 3 yo.

so to recap for everyone who can't focus: old lady makes lots of noise at a toddler movie but still manages to find the nerve to shush a toddler. got it?

Got it. Even more trivial than it appears. Thanks for the clarification!

Oh please - you came to off-topic for trivial. if not then you'd be over on the "why don't you believe in god" thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought OP said the annoying woman in the Pooh shirt was singing along and a 3 year old shushed her.

nope. read again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Weird. Your in a movie with your kid and just have to jump on DCUM? That's a new one.

Typical, not paying attention to her kid, but playing on her phone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh my god, people. did you not read the original post at all. the older woman was wearing a pooh shirt and making noise herself, so OP is wondering why she had the nerve to shush the perfectly normal 3 yo.

so to recap for everyone who can't focus: old lady makes lots of noise at a toddler movie but still manages to find the nerve to shush a toddler. got it?

Got it. Even more trivial than it appears. Thanks for the clarification!

Oh please - you came to off-topic for trivial. if not then you'd be over on the "why don't you believe in god" thread.

Well, the OP can't type then because her title does say "OLDER WOMAN JUST SHUSHED "BY" 3 YEAR OLD AT THE WINNIE THE POOH MOVIE. SHUSHED BY leads me to believe she was indeed shushed by the three year old... just sayin'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought OP said the annoying woman in the Pooh shirt was singing along and a 3 year old shushed her.

nope. read again.

You read correctly, OP cannot type.

[Anonymous]

I just spent approximately three minute reading this thread and another minute or two answering this nonsense. Time I will never get back. I am the idiot!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just spent approximately three minute reading this thread and another minute or two answering this nonsense. Time I will never get back. I am the idiot!!

Three minutes! You read really slow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The woman is wearing a Pooh shirt and singing along. I am usually super respectful but 1. This is a movie for little kids and 2. The theater is full of kids and it is fairly loud. What a jerk.

So, the first sentence is in present tense, which makes me think she's texting during the movie. I can't stand that - all these little gadgets lighting up in the dark.

And really - HOW can anyone understand who's shushing whom?

She uses the passive - "An older woman just shushed by 3 year. . ." With the way it's written the three yo is shushing the older woman.

OP, you're a nut job.

[Anonymous]

OP, regardless of who shushed whom, I think we've established that everyone hates you.

Moving on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:oh my god, people. did you not read the original post at all. the older woman was wearing a pooh shirt and making noise herself, so OP is wondering why she had the nerve to shush the perfectly normal 3 yo.

so to recap for everyone who can't focus: old lady makes lots of noise at a toddler movie but still manages to find the nerve to shush a toddler. got it?

Perhaps your reading comprehension isn't great: the title says the woman was shushed BY a three year old. Not that she shushed a 3 yr old. Who knows what really happened? And why is OP not focusing on the movie/kids?

[Anonymous]

Backing away from the silly sniping about who shushed whom, I would like to report that in our theater this afternoon, there were several single middle-aged men, and two groups of three men. One of the groups laughed at all the jokes and clapped with glee. I'm not sure if I should applaud the spirit that makes adult men without kids seek out the favorite characters of their childhood, or be majorly creeped out by their very presence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Backing away from the silly sniping about who shushed whom, I would like to report that in our theater this afternoon, there were several single middle-aged men, and two groups of three men. One of the groups laughed at all the jokes and clapped with glee. I'm not sure if I should applaud the spirit that makes adult men without kids seek out the favorite characters of their childhood, or be majorly creeped out by their very presence.

and the movie was???

I still watch The Wizard of Oz.

[Anonymous]

Come on, people, it's pretty obvious that she meant to type that the older woman had "just shushed MY 3 year old", rather than how the title read originally. Yes, OP, you're really annoying being on that damn PDA in the middle of a dark theater, I'm sure you were irritating everyone in your perimeter. If you're that disrespectful in the theater, chances are you probably don't give a hoot about how your daughter acts in the same environment. If you had put down your phone and actually paid attention to your daughter you may have had a better idea as to why she was shoosed in the first place, me thinks...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

and the movie was???

I still watch The Wizard of Oz.

Winnie the Pooh.

(Great movie, btw, perhaps especially for a little one's first theater experience. Sweet and familiar, not too long, good music.)