Why isn't there a test requirement to get a license to keep or handle a dog?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Same question could be asked for kids.

It's a shame when people compare children to dogs in any way. But let's imagine that it's a fair question. Did you ever stop to think that if your parents would have had to be licensed to have a child that you yourself might not be here?

If I wasn’t alive, I wouldn’t have occasion to think about it.

Smart answer. But having to have a license before having a child might have affected you in someway. Who's to say that you would be approved to have a child.

I don’t have a child.

[Anonymous]

The adopt don't shop people and the puppy mills wouldn't have it. Responsible breeders would be fine with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Same question could be asked for kids.

It's a shame when people compare children to dogs in any way. But let's imagine that it's a fair question. Did you ever stop to think that if your parents would have had to be licensed to have a child that you yourself might not be here?

If I wasn’t alive, I wouldn’t have occasion to think about it.

Smart answer. But having to have a license before having a child might have affected you in someway. Who's to say that you would be approved to have a child.

I don’t have a child.

That's a good thing.

[Anonymous]

Agree, would love it if there were fewer dogs around.