low salary for women in dating

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Who cares? It's called a pre-nup.


The best deal for a high-earning man is a wife who signs a prenup and stays home to manage their kids and house. Why women sign up for that, I don't understand.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who cares? It's called a pre-nup.


The best deal for a high-earning man is a wife who signs a prenup and stays home to manage their kids and house. Why women sign up for that, I don't understand.


Yes read Strangers by Belle Burden and see how that turns out for the woman.
Anonymous
"The best deal for a high-earning man is a wife who signs a prenup and stays home to manage their kids and house. Why women sign up for that, I don't understand."

I could see how this could make sense -- This presumes a high earner and not a movie star/athlete or family money billionaire situation.

He agrees to give me control over the family budget and investments. I decide on schools, medical issues, college, etc... for our children. If he owns or later acquires a business, I'm given a 50% ownership stake in it. Any inheritance or gifts from his family become jointly owned. If he has a child with someone else while we're married, funding for that child will be limited to $25K/year. I don't want any woman to think that getting pregnant by him would make her rich.

If we no longer want to be married it's up to me and my lawyers to officially divorce or not. Either way, he can live his own life separate from me and I get $350K/annually (with COLA) for the remainder of my life. (I'd require a trust that holds enough money to fund this in case he blows his money before completing all the obligations to me. I'd figure out a way to receive his income in such a way that I can monitor it.) When I reach age 65, I get a lump sum of $2M to transition into retirement living. I'd probably use this to buy a modest summer home. When he dies, I get 80% of his estate even if he remarries or has more children. Up until 5 years of marriage, I get the title to the house and 10% of his net worth. Upon 5 years of marriage, I get 25% of his net worth if we divorce, and 50% at 10 years. At 15 years and thereafter, I get 60%. Under a divorce scenario, he gets nothing of mine. I keep membership in all clubs and anything special he has access to. If we have children, I get full physical and legal custody and $75K/annually with COLA per child for child support until they turn 23. I'll encourage them to spend lots of time with him but they'll live/go to school where I am living if he moves away. If I choose to put them in private K-12 school, he pays for that. He funds 100% of college expenses, including privates. If they go to graduate school, he pays for at least half of it.

If marriage ends with his death, his estate goes entirely to me upon his death, regardless of other children from other marriages. I'll decide whether/how much to give them myself.

Anonymous
Not if there is a prenup and a will and a trust.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who cares? It's called a pre-nup.


The best deal for a high-earning man is a wife who signs a prenup and stays home to manage their kids and house. Why women sign up for that, I don't understand.


I didn't sign up for it as much as it just happened. We were both working F/T with a toddler who was constantly getting sick in daycare. DH had the higher-paying, less flexible job, and I really missed my baby during the day. After baby #2, I became a P/T home-based consultant and never looked back. I wouldn't trade the years I spent being with the kids for anything.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:"The best deal for a high-earning man is a wife who signs a prenup and stays home to manage their kids and house. Why women sign up for that, I don't understand."

I could see how this could make sense -- This presumes a high earner and not a movie star/athlete or family money billionaire situation.

He agrees to give me control over the family budget and investments. I decide on schools, medical issues, college, etc... for our children. If he owns or later acquires a business, I'm given a 50% ownership stake in it. Any inheritance or gifts from his family become jointly owned. If he has a child with someone else while we're married, funding for that child will be limited to $25K/year. I don't want any woman to think that getting pregnant by him would make her rich.

If we no longer want to be married it's up to me and my lawyers to officially divorce or not. Either way, he can live his own life separate from me and I get $350K/annually (with COLA) for the remainder of my life. (I'd require a trust that holds enough money to fund this in case he blows his money before completing all the obligations to me. I'd figure out a way to receive his income in such a way that I can monitor it.) When I reach age 65, I get a lump sum of $2M to transition into retirement living. I'd probably use this to buy a modest summer home. When he dies, I get 80% of his estate even if he remarries or has more children. Up until 5 years of marriage, I get the title to the house and 10% of his net worth. Upon 5 years of marriage, I get 25% of his net worth if we divorce, and 50% at 10 years. At 15 years and thereafter, I get 60%. Under a divorce scenario, he gets nothing of mine. I keep membership in all clubs and anything special he has access to. If we have children, I get full physical and legal custody and $75K/annually with COLA per child for child support until they turn 23. I'll encourage them to spend lots of time with him but they'll live/go to school where I am living if he moves away. If I choose to put them in private K-12 school, he pays for that. He funds 100% of college expenses, including privates. If they go to graduate school, he pays for at least half of it.

If marriage ends with his death, his estate goes entirely to me upon his death, regardless of other children from other marriages. I'll decide whether/how much to give them myself.



That would be a sweet prenup! The one in Strangers allowed the husband to keep 100% of the assets titled in his name, even if they were acquired during the marriage, so he kept all the assets titled in his name during the marriage.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who cares? It's called a pre-nup.


The best deal for a high-earning man is a wife who signs a prenup and stays home to manage their kids and house. Why women sign up for that, I don't understand.


I didn't sign up for it as much as it just happened. We were both working F/T with a toddler who was constantly getting sick in daycare. DH had the higher-paying, less flexible job, and I really missed my baby during the day. After baby #2, I became a P/T home-based consultant and never looked back. I wouldn't trade the years I spent being with the kids for anything.


Okay, but you didn't sign a prenup, so you are entitled to half of all marital assets. Hopefully, you would be fine if he unexpectedly left you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:High earning men don’t care about how much money women make.


The ones who do probably have a spending problem and are looking for a woman to help them make ends meet. You don't want to be that woman.


That is the case with most of the women as you see a lot of them are just trying to find a guy who could support their lifestyle of travel, shopping, going out, and other bills. LOL
Anonymous
I think Op is also asking about some of the gold diggers who don't bring anything to the table whether it is financially or other support/fun but expects everything to be taken care of.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If you are a high earner making $500K or more than below what $ range of income you would avoid? I say $200K unless she is very attractive and excellent in bed.


Depends on age range of the women you’re looking to date. If you want a hot chick in her 20’s it’s not realistic to expect 200k+ unless you are both handsome and rich yourself.

If you’re dating middle aged professionals, sure.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If you are a high earner making $500K or more than below what $ range of income you would avoid? I say $200K unless she is very attractive and excellent in bed.


Depends on age range of the women you’re looking to date. If you want a hot chick in her 20’s it’s not realistic to expect 200k+ unless you are both handsome and rich yourself.

If you’re dating middle aged professionals, sure.


And the same age as her. If you’re older, you have to makeup the age gap want bringing significantly more money than her. A hot twenty something who makes $200k can date anyone she wants.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:"The best deal for a high-earning man is a wife who signs a prenup and stays home to manage their kids and house. Why women sign up for that, I don't understand."

I could see how this could make sense -- This presumes a high earner and not a movie star/athlete or family money billionaire situation.

He agrees to give me control over the family budget and investments. I decide on schools, medical issues, college, etc... for our children. If he owns or later acquires a business, I'm given a 50% ownership stake in it. Any inheritance or gifts from his family become jointly owned. If he has a child with someone else while we're married, funding for that child will be limited to $25K/year. I don't want any woman to think that getting pregnant by him would make her rich.

If we no longer want to be married it's up to me and my lawyers to officially divorce or not. Either way, he can live his own life separate from me and I get $350K/annually (with COLA) for the remainder of my life. (I'd require a trust that holds enough money to fund this in case he blows his money before completing all the obligations to me. I'd figure out a way to receive his income in such a way that I can monitor it.) When I reach age 65, I get a lump sum of $2M to transition into retirement living. I'd probably use this to buy a modest summer home. When he dies, I get 80% of his estate even if he remarries or has more children. Up until 5 years of marriage, I get the title to the house and 10% of his net worth. Upon 5 years of marriage, I get 25% of his net worth if we divorce, and 50% at 10 years. At 15 years and thereafter, I get 60%. Under a divorce scenario, he gets nothing of mine. I keep membership in all clubs and anything special he has access to. If we have children, I get full physical and legal custody and $75K/annually with COLA per child for child support until they turn 23. I'll encourage them to spend lots of time with him but they'll live/go to school where I am living if he moves away. If I choose to put them in private K-12 school, he pays for that. He funds 100% of college expenses, including privates. If they go to graduate school, he pays for at least half of it.

If marriage ends with his death, his estate goes entirely to me upon his death, regardless of other children from other marriages. I'll decide whether/how much to give them myself.



I love how women think they can dictate a prenup or divorce agreement that exceeds what the law by default allows.

Dream on.

Especially this part!: "If he has a child with someone else while we're married, funding for that child will be limited to $25K/year. I don't want any woman to think that getting pregnant by him would make her rich." This is decided by the state, not you, lady.
post reply Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: