I 100% agree that most powerful / successful men were able to get there due in key part to the support of their wife. But that's not what the term "power couple" means. It means a couple where both in their own right are a big deal. Frankly I think that model works best for couples without kids since both parents going full bore at their jobs is not a good scenario for raising children. |
| She's basically a very high end hooker. |
Exactly. Rich billionaire plus mousy wife you’ve never heard of who doesn’t work….. not a power couple, even if she gets to wield power because of his money. I would even say Trump and Melanie aren’t a power couple because she’s never done anything of note or of worth other than lie down. I hate Sanchez but there does seem to be something different about her vs Melanie. She had her own job and was scrambling hard to climb the social and money ladder before she met bezos, and had a lot of social and money capital before she married him. So even though she’s a gold digger, and acquired a lot more power through him, she’s probably still a contributor to their power couple status. |
| I think of a “power couple” as two people who are BOTH extremely accomplished, professionally powerful in their own right. Top trial lawyer + politician. Famous heart transplant surgeon + famous journalist. Etc etc. |
|
It's an embarrassing profile. But how could it be anything else with her?
She isn't "power" anything. |
You must be kidding. The military alone has thousands. |
You can be a power couple if one has a career and the other has a lot of power and clout in philanthropy circles or something of that sort. One spouse can be on boards and gala committees etc... - meaning they have a presence. |
Oh stop it. Michelle is fungible. |
But not as filthy rich! Must be some good P. |