NP. Are you taking issue with the use of the term "tier" to describe segments of a school's population, or the idea that the top kids at a base school can hold their own against many kids at TJ? The OP introduced the idea of tiers by referring to a "lower third" at TJ, and it's clearly the case that many of the top kids at base schools are as accomplished as many TJ students. Help us out here. |
|
My kid is genuinely brilliant, not stressed or motivated by grades and is solidly an average student plus 3 season athlete. If he was evenly remotely motivated he'd get all As but he doesn't care.
So it's definitely possible to do well at TJ and be a 3 season athlete. That said, my kid going into TJ was a very different person. Hormones hit him hard and that fog hasn't lifted. |
| I will say that there are programs heavily recruiting athletes from TJ. The football program is not very strong and a couple of the kids have Harvard knocking on their doors. Hopkins recruits from the track team. Not sure about other teams. |
Wuh? Ivy athlete recruits are very very strong athletes, esp they are knocking on the recruits door. Zero high academic kids are ivy recruits unless they are also very good athletes. |
Objection! Sustained! 1. Top-tier base school students are every bit as capable of success in college as mid-to-lower tier TJ students. 2. They're just going to have to work a lot harder than the TJ kids will relative to what they did in high school. 3. I understand not thinking the base school kids are up to snuff…and [are] solidly above the bottom tier. They're nothing to sneeze at. Gross |
I said the football team wasn't strong. That doesn't mean the individual athletes aren't strong. |
| If a TJ kid goes to VT and a non TJ kid goes to MIT, is the latter more prepared for grad school? |
Does the VT TJ kid push for credit overloads / jumping into advanced/grad classes / heavy involvement in research fro freshman year or do they just take the default placement their AP credit would have awarded them and brag about how easy it is? |
Let’s agree that the MIT kid had a very rigorous undergrad experience and it is significantly more rigorous than VT kid. |
|
My kid is a junior at TJ and fall/spring varsity athlete and my observations are similar to what others have shared. Grades are good (As/some Bs) but she is also not one of the kids gunning hard for an ivy. For her, the (non-academic) benefits of sports are the physical/mental health boost and connection with teammates. There is not just one path to take at TJ and if your kids wants to play a sport, they can always try and then step out.
Sports also seem to function a bit differently at TJ than other base schools. It's not uncommon for kids to skip practice/games if they have a huge test. If I had done that in high school, I would have been benched for a week. |
This is fine at base schools, same with skipping for a club practice or event. |
TJ sports is more like an extended PE class, no serious participation. Academics are given top priority, every coach reiterates that. |
And to clarify: for varsity. |
The MIT kid will be better prepared for grad school. Just as the TJ kid will be better prepared for college. As an aside TJ has sent 29 students to MIT in the last 4 years. AFAICT, no other FCPS school has sent more than 3 in that time. |
This is not universally true. If you are a legitimate state level competitor or better, you take it pretty seriously. These are hooks. |