Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did you know she wrote a book about having a baby?

https://www.amazon.com/Dear-Future-Mama-Pregnancy-Motherhood/dp/1404117598

Step One: Hire a surrogate.

[Anonymous]

This is child trafficking and it’s demonic. Stop normalizing this crap.

[Anonymous]

Didn't she have some health issues during pregnancy and post-partem? Anyway, the only thing I find a bit cringe is the social media post, but hey to each their own....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:surrogacy is exploitive. i think the minimum payment should be a million dollars or a house.

It’s modern slavery. Perhaps worse.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn't she have some health issues during pregnancy and post-partem? Anyway, the only thing I find a bit cringe is the social media post, but hey to each their own....

If I had to guess she's doing skin-to-skin contact immediately after the birth just like many people do. I also find this photo cringey, but I personally cringe when anyone posts such a personal shot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or, maybe she couldn't carry a child. Are we all phony if we have kids we didn't give birth to?

Yes if you use another women’s womb due to vanity.

+ 1. I’m against all commercial surrogacy.

[Anonymous]

I’ve never understood why the people who claim we are basically living in A Handmaid’s Tale are okay with this. Children are a gift; we don’t have a right to have children by any means necessary. And I say that as a person who suffered tremendously due to infertility and who doesn’t have the sort of family I always imagined I’d have. Surrogacy is using women for their bodies and is totally gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never understood why the people who claim we are basically living in A Handmaid’s Tale are okay with this. Children are a gift; we don’t have a right to have children by any means necessary. And I say that as a person who suffered tremendously due to infertility and who doesn’t have the sort of family I always imagined I’d have. Surrogacy is using women for their bodies and is totally gross.

You think commercial surrogacy is similar to the slavery that was portrayed in The Handmaids Tale?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never understood why the people who claim we are basically living in A Handmaid’s Tale are okay with this. Children are a gift; we don’t have a right to have children by any means necessary. And I say that as a person who suffered tremendously due to infertility and who doesn’t have the sort of family I always imagined I’d have. Surrogacy is using women for their bodies and is totally gross.

You think commercial surrogacy is similar to the slavery that was portrayed in The Handmaids Tale?

Yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never understood why the people who claim we are basically living in A Handmaid’s Tale are okay with this. Children are a gift; we don’t have a right to have children by any means necessary. And I say that as a person who suffered tremendously due to infertility and who doesn’t have the sort of family I always imagined I’d have. Surrogacy is using women for their bodies and is totally gross.

You think commercial surrogacy is similar to the slavery that was portrayed in The Handmaids Tale?

Yes.

Can you share why? I watched The Handmaid's Tale and don't see that parallel. What are we missing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never understood why the people who claim we are basically living in A Handmaid’s Tale are okay with this. Children are a gift; we don’t have a right to have children by any means necessary. And I say that as a person who suffered tremendously due to infertility and who doesn’t have the sort of family I always imagined I’d have. Surrogacy is using women for their bodies and is totally gross.

You think commercial surrogacy is similar to the slavery that was portrayed in The Handmaids Tale?

Not the slavery aspect, obviously, but do I think that poor women carrying children for richer often infertile people is similar? It’s not completely out of left field to feel the same ick about women being used for their uteruses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:surrogacy is exploitive. i think the minimum payment should be a million dollars or a house.

It’s modern slavery. Perhaps worse.

it's not slavery if the women are paid extravagant amounts. what i object to is that some juridictions put caps on how much a surrogate can be paid. if anything, there should be a high minimum. so high that vain celebs don't treat this kind of purchase like buying a handbag. it needs to be one of the most serious purchases they ever make.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't she have some health issues during pregnancy and post-partem? Anyway, the only thing I find a bit cringe is the social media post, but hey to each their own....

If I had to guess she's doing skin-to-skin contact immediately after the birth just like many people do. I also find this photo cringey, but I personally cringe when anyone posts such a personal shot.

Posting the picture is tacky and tine deaf. She should have kept that private.

[Anonymous]

This is sick and should be illegal.