No |
| 38 |
| Yet another thread where rich old ladies think their money and their selfishness somehow trump biology. |
You think this world with Anti Vaxers leading the way is a great place to bring a child? Third in your 40's? So when that kid is 20 you are in your 60s fabulous parenting. Having a kid is not only about money. You are selfish. |
+1. |
You were lucky. Do you not know how lucky you were? The stupidity on this thread is staggering. |
Wait, what do you mean? I don’t think many of us used ivf to have 4th babies in our 40s. Biology trumped us! |
|
1st kid-24
2nd kid-26 3rd kid-29 (just 2 weeks after turning 29) 4th kid-30 (just 2 weeks before turning 31) |
|
Poster at 22:42 here.
Sorry, I misread your question. I was 30; other kids were 6, 4, and 23 months |
DP -- so you think all babies conceived naturally in one's 40s should be aborted? I don't understand your point here. I'm 45 and probably would have an abortion if I somehow got pregnant now, but it would be a hard choice. I would never judge anyone for making another one. |
Women have been having babies on their 40s for centuries. Both my dad and his mother were born to women in their mid-40s. Before birth control this was incredibly common because women just had kids until they couldn't anymore. It's weird to suddenly decide it's selfish now? |
Same PP for me and many others. I was 39 woth NY 6th miscarriage that almost took my uterus. My hail Mary was a reproductive immunologist (Dr. Jubiz) and at 40 I had #3. There was zero discussion on a 4th. I was done and so was my body. |
|
I'm 57:
1st & 2nd kids (twins) - 24 3rd kid - 26 4th kid - 29 (almost 30) My mom also had 4 kids; she had them at ages 23, 25, 28, and 30. My DH's mom had 4 kids; she had them at ages 27, 30, 31, and 32. |
+1,000 |
| How old are your kids? |