I did this for a while, and I hated it. I hated being a big fish in a small pond because I felt there wasn’t any room for me to grow. The key for me is that I never feel like I’m competing against others. I’m only ever competing against myself. What I like about competitive places is that they usually provide opportunities to try all kinds of things, because they attract an expansive energy. I like swimming in an ocean, not a pond, because there is just so much more to see. |
True. |
This is a function of just geography more than anything. If you moved Harvard to the middle of Iowa, then no suprise, everyone in Iowa and surrounding states would be obsessed with Harvard. To this day, 86% of all college students attend college within 500 miles of home. |
I get this for preferring universities to LACs. What’s odd about the American college system, though, is that the so-called “ocean” is broken up into small ponds, while most of the schools you are deriding as “ponds” are many times larger. People could be forgiven for thinking there is “more to see” and more “expansive energy” at NYU than at Dartmouth. |
Exactly my ivy kid's experience. |
|
Great for people whose kids can access the T-10’s or T-5 LAC’s. I went to two of those, am
Doing well, so this isn’t envy or sour grapes. But the vast majority don’t go to those kinds of schools and it’s important for kids to know that that’s ok- those schools aren’t the only golden ticket to things (and sometimes they’re not a ticket to anywhere for those who have bad experiences). |
This was me growing up. Hated it. Wasn’t just a big fish was a fish out of water. Much happier now in a community that values education, intelligence and hard work. My kids have academic peers in school and doing well in school is valued here. |
Simple math: 2-3% go to the top30ish. Most parents with top 20% kids think their kids are top 2-3% and thus entitled to it. Grade inflation has made the problem much worse, when 10-15% of students at many high schools graduate with 4.0uw, over 50% with 4.0+ Weighted. 25-30 years ago, one kid maybe two would have 4.0uw. Same with the Top10/ivy, under 1% of college students attend: Most parents with top 10% kids think they are top1% and thus entitled to a spot. Factor in hooked spots and unless you are truly a 99%ile kid you have no realistic shot nor would the school be a great fit. If parents were able to more accurately assess where their student stood relative to the pool it would cause less wasted reaching. As a parent with a 99.9%ile kid, top everything academically+creative, as well as a 98%ile kid as well as a 92-93rd%ile kid, the difference between their academic potential is clear, despite the fact that all qualified for at least some portion of the academically gifted and talented program in our public schools. We moved to private for 4th-6th-7th and all were tracked into different math groups and the differences were suddenly very apparent. |
Where is your citation for this? Top 30 nat’l universities and SLACs? |
+1 |
And yet she and her peers are going to be working alongside, and probably even managed by, the kids who are content to study a reasonable amount at a lower ranked school, and who also actually HAVE hobbies, interests, and a social life. |
|
Everybody Wants to Rule the World
|
Hopefully their reading comprehension will be better than yours. |
Says you? There's a whole "elite tier" of careers. |
| US is designed around the idea of competition and freedom to compete. Everyone gets a chance to wrestle to the top of the heap, instead of being forced to stay lower class or upper class. |