| everyone here could use a magic brownie. |
| If it becomes Schedule III, it can be legally prescribed. How the federal govt as an employer deals with that is another story. |
| It’s illegal at the federal level. A prescription won’t matter. |
We have been told officially that "prior experimentation" that was discontinued before applying for Federal related job is handled "case-by-case" and is not automatically disqualifying (key word there is "automatically"). We also have been told that any use by an employee or contractor after starting Federal work will be disqualifying -- and they explicitly said a "prescription" does not change that. |
but how would it not change for Feds since they are the ones changing the classification? |
It is still an illegal drug when on Schedule III. The criminal penalties in Federal Court are diminished, but it is still illegal. |
But feds only test for schedule I drugs for drug test so they are contradicting themselves on it. |
100% |
Prior “experimentation” that occurred > 7 years ago does not require disclosure for MOST roles. My understanding is that experimentation that occurred within the last 7 years pretty much always results in a disqualification from federal employment. |
There will be a regulatory amendment in conjunction with the scheduled change process. |
so, what do you think that amendment would be? Is it going to be in or out of drug tests? |
Not until approved by FDA. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11105 |
It will remain. No Devil’s lettuce. |