MIT professor killed in home

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he was killed in his home, it's more likely to be a home invasion gone wrong than something political or religious.

Just STFU with your pure speculation. It’s not helpful.

PP you replied to. Might want to look in the mirror and stop swearing at strangers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't think I've ever known a MIT professor to be killed by a student or mugging. Lots of on campus grad student shootings / muggings in my time (20 years ago).

I am aware of several instances over the last decades- usually in grad school. This is a time period that young students, mostly male, can present with schizophrenia and for a lot of these students it kind of comes on suddenly with psychotic episodes. No one I know was actually killed, but several profs and one TA were threatened, fixated upon, followed and stalked, and one attempted assault with serious injuries.

[Anonymous]

Most of the time, it is someone they know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Up here in Massachusetts some folks are speculating there is a tie to Brown, but the agencies have shared info and others are saying it’s unlikely.

It’s sad when you have to look at a situation and hope it’s just a random or domestic murder and not antisemitism.

On another note this professor was doing some groundbreaking research into clean energy climate change solutions, which one can either look at as a loss to humanity or a motive for murder.

I used to live a few minutes from where he was shot in Brookline when I was in grad school. It's shocking: Brookline is such a safe area (or was). I used to go on long walks at night by myself through those streets.

A friend who works at MIT told me that Nuno F. G. Loureiro was publicly pro-Israel. I truly hope that this was not related to his murder. Brookline is known as a very "Jewish" area, and it breaks my heart to think not only of Loureiro's own grieving family, but the families of all in the area celebrating the holiday there now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he was killed in his home, it's more likely to be a home invasion gone wrong than something political or religious.

Just STFU with your pure speculation. It’s not helpful.

Wait… what?!?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he was killed in his home, it's more likely to be a home invasion gone wrong than something political or religious.

Just STFU with your pure speculation. It’s not helpful.

Anger management classes for you, STAT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you think that we are on the end he of a cliff? I’m feeling a lot of anxiety and wish i could just go off grid and not have to worry about society or money. Just educate my children and try and prepare them for a future i cannot even imagine.

Putting criminals in prison for significant periods of time might help.

Most of the people doing bad things have done multiple bad things before, & have shown little indication that they are looking to change their ways.

Imagine having been arrested 10+ times & still not getting the hint that you are on the wrong path…

[Anonymous]

The Trump administration has diverted resources away from anti-terrorist efforts to focus on deportation. I don’t know if this is terrorism but the Kirk shooting, the Brown shooting and possibly this seem very odd. We are all less safe as law enforcement is pulled away from protecting us from terrorism of all types. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/16/us/politics/dhs-agents-reassigned.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share

[Anonymous]

The professor was Portuguese Catholic, not Jewish. Why does everyone jump to assuming that the professor was Jewish? Other religions also have smart people

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Could be a love affair gone wrong or just a random mugging. Is Brookline generally safe?

This was my first thought, especially if he is not hetero. Don't scream at me. I have no idea if he is or isn't. I say this as police acknowledge crimes of passion are especially brutal when two men are involved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he was killed in his home, it's more likely to be a home invasion gone wrong than something political or religious.

Just STFU with your pure speculation. It’s not helpful.

OP speculated this has something to do with the professor’s religion. Have a seat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Trump administration has diverted resources away from anti-terrorist efforts to focus on deportation. I don’t know if this is terrorism but the Kirk shooting, the Brown shooting and possibly this seem very odd. We are all less safe as law enforcement is pulled away from protecting us from terrorism of all types. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/16/us/politics/dhs-agents-reassigned.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share

Federal law enforcement doesn't police residential areas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The professor was Portuguese Catholic, not Jewish. Why does everyone jump to assuming that the professor was Jewish? Other religions also have smart people

Could you provide a citation for this assertion? Not being snarky, it's just that I've read dozens of news stories, his Wiki page, and several MIT source pieces about him none of which indicate any religious preference or faith.

He was a physicist, so the odds are solid that he was agnostic - or atheist. I would think that if he professed any faith with any degree of passion, he would have included it at some point in his bio information? Unless he considered it irrelevant to the world's perception of him, which is also consistent with a science-minded individual.

[Anonymous]

I feel like the Times of Israel would have mentioned he was a Jew?

https://www.timesofisrael.com/massachusetts-institute-of-technology-professor-shot-dead-at-his-home-near-boston/

[Anonymous]

So very sad.

He was well liked and respected - hailing from central Portugal.

His focus was into topics like magnetic reconnection, turbulence, and developing clean energy solutions through fusion.

May his soul rest in peace, his loved ones find consolation in his life well lived, and his work not be in vain.