Why can't we fine parents of poor academic achievers?

[Anonymous]

The disruptive kids parents will scream racism if you try it. You should try it though, it’s a great idea, just ignore their screams of racism. Nobody cares anymore it’s tiring.

[Anonymous]

Because that sounds elitist and ableist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The disruptive kids parents will scream racism if you try it. You should try it though, it’s a great idea, just ignore their screams of racism. Nobody cares anymore it’s tiring.

But you're not racist for suggesting that the only disruptive kids are not white?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The disruptive kids parents will scream racism if you try it. You should try it though, it’s a great idea, just ignore their screams of racism. Nobody cares anymore it’s tiring.

Edgelord incel

[Anonymous]

OP here, I just don't want to have to pay more for less.

Sure, it's a social safety net, but your kids take resources and mine don't take much if any.

I'm not asking for anything extra here. You're the ones asking for special treatment.

Why am I obliged?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here, I just don't want to have to pay more for less.

Sure, it's a social safety net, but your kids take resources and mine don't take much if any.

I'm not asking for anything extra here. You're the ones asking for special treatment.

Why am I obliged?

You are the one asking for special treatment. You want to pay less to get more.

You clearly do not actually know enough about academic achievement to have a respectable perspective on this issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here, I just don't want to have to pay more for less.

Sure, it's a social safety net, but your kids take resources and mine don't take much if any.

I'm not asking for anything extra here. You're the ones asking for special treatment.

Why am I obliged?

Because that's what a safety net is for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here, I just don't want to have to pay more for less.

Sure, it's a social safety net, but your kids take resources and mine don't take much if any.

I'm not asking for anything extra here. You're the ones asking for special treatment.

Why am I obliged?

You are the one asking for special treatment. You want to pay less to get more.

You clearly do not actually know enough about academic achievement to have a respectable perspective on this issue.

Academic achievement isn't a zip code.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It frustrates that my kids behave are eager learners, but I have to pay more to get them a decent education, when they are actually easier to teach than those who don't perform as well and are actually actively disrupting my kids.

You can’t be this obtuse. My son’s 2nd-grade class has four children with autism, one of whom has moderate needs. He sometimes struggles to follow directions and can be disruptive at times.

But my son has learned compassion. Education isn’t just about numbers and letters — it’s about learning how to live in a community.

Actually, it is about academics, or used to be. But we’ve turned schools into social service centers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The public schools are a social safety net, designed for the average and below average. If your kids are eager learners, they have the choice to seek a better environment.

So who are all those kids in public schools whose parents claim they brilliant, in the 99% of every test ever taken? Someone should let them know they in the wrong place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here, I just don't want to have to pay more for less.

Sure, it's a social safety net, but your kids take resources and mine don't take much if any.

I'm not asking for anything extra here. You're the ones asking for special treatment.

Why am I obliged?

The only kids who don’t take a lot of resources are the average kids, the huge middle. If you had a child who was in the top academically they would get classes just for them in middle and high schools. Children who are struggling with learning issues the get extra resources to help achieve their goals.

It’s not a social safety net, that’s not how education works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public schools are a social safety net, designed for the average and below average. If your kids are eager learners, they have the choice to seek a better environment.

So who are all those kids in public schools whose parents claim they brilliant, in the 99% of every test ever taken? Someone should let them know they in the wrong place.

After reading your sentences, I think you’re definitively in the 1%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here, I just don't want to have to pay more for less.

Sure, it's a social safety net, but your kids take resources and mine don't take much if any.

I'm not asking for anything extra here. You're the ones asking for special treatment.

Why am I obliged?

The only kids who don’t take a lot of resources are the average kids, the huge middle. If you had a child who was in the top academically they would get classes just for them in middle and high schools. Children who are struggling with learning issues the get extra resources to help achieve their goals.

It’s not a social safety net, that’s not how education works.

If the classes are to capacity, advanced classes don't take any more resources. However, everyone should not have to pay for additional teachers/aides to help facilitate the dumbing down of a class. At least move them to their own space so the others don't have to suffer.

[Anonymous]

We can't even get half the parents to send in school supplies for their kids, pick up the phone when the clinic calls because they're vomiting or spiked a fever, or update an emergency care form. What makes you think they'd pay a fine?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The disruptive kids parents will scream racism if you try it. You should try it though, it’s a great idea, just ignore their screams of racism. Nobody cares anymore it’s tiring.

You are a disgusting racist POS.