Hayfield Principal Moving to Gatehouse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Worst principal in the history of planet earth, good riddance. Good bye cocksucker

Not even the worse in Fairfax County. McNair Upper’s is worse and Cub Run’s is also worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wish DOGE could come into Gatehouse

+1000

[Anonymous]

Is Hayfield principal replacing someone or are we getting a new "executive position?"

Also, anyone who signs his name with "Dr" instead of his given name is: fill in the blank

[Anonymous]

And the school board and admin wonder why parents don't trust them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is Hayfield principal replacing someone or are we getting a new "executive position?"

Also, anyone who signs his name with "Dr" instead of his given name is: fill in the blank

Maybe the same kind of professional who mass-emails unnecessary details, such that "I have applied for, interviewed for, and have accepted the position of Senior Administrator of Nontraditional School Programs."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Hayfield principal replacing someone or are we getting a new "executive position?"

Also, anyone who signs his name with "Dr" instead of his given name is: fill in the blank

Maybe the same kind of professional who mass-emails unnecessary details, such that "I have applied for, interviewed for, and have accepted the position of Senior Administrator of Nontraditional School Programs."

He’s wanting to say he wasn’t removed and his choice to go, but as soon as he writes Gatehouse, no one thinks it’s anything other than the promotion exit once again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish DOGE could come into Gatehouse

+1000

Nah, they'd just fire competant people who are easy to fire. You need someone to carry out the spirit of DOGE, not the actual reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do we have so many people employed at Gatehouse?

Our principal/VP to student ratio is around 500 students per admin. Plus however many teachers and support staff. Our teachers have a ratio of 150-170 students per teacher.

Surely the Gatehouse ratio of Gatehouse to staff should be similar.

Right now, they sit at around 2000 non school based administrative/Gatehouse employees. That is only around 90 students per Gatehouse level full time employee.

Something is very wrong with their staffing formulas.

Because it's a jobs program for people who sucked in school-based positions. I really hope parents start demanding answers for these horrible decisions.

Taxpayers can demand answers to, by voting better in school board elections.

But if past predicts future, they won’t

PP here. Of course. My point is simply that this would be the best way to hold them accountable.

In my dream world the local Fairfax County parties decide to do what's best for the children and actual endorse sane human beings for school board...but I know that's even more of a pipe dream than Fairfax County voters doing anything but voting for whoever shows up on the blue sample ballot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is Hayfield principal replacing someone or are we getting a new "executive position?"

Also, anyone who signs his name with "Dr" instead of his given name is: fill in the blank

If you read the OP, the principal mentioned a "predecessor."

But it's a totally fair question. One of my kids' principals went on to a newly created (unnecessary) executive position - although in her case she didn't fail up, she was genuinely good at her job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And the school board and admin wonder why parents don't trust them.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Hayfield principal replacing someone or are we getting a new "executive position?"

Also, anyone who signs his name with "Dr" instead of his given name is: fill in the blank

Maybe the same kind of professional who mass-emails unnecessary details, such that "I have applied for, interviewed for, and have accepted the position of Senior Administrator of Nontraditional School Programs."

The second “have” in that sentence is unnecessary and a grammatical error.

Why are we promoting people who can’t write to senior positions in Gatehouse?

[Anonymous]

This is absolutely NOT a promotion. Anyone who thinks this is a promotion is greatly misinformed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is absolutely NOT a promotion. Anyone who thinks this is a promotion is greatly misinformed.

It's not getting fired, which is what should have happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is absolutely NOT a promotion. Anyone who thinks this is a promotion is greatly misinformed.

Yeah, this is a demotion. I’m not saying he shouldn’t have been fired. But anyone who is saying this is a promotion is wrong.

Anyone can look up the job descriptions. The position he is taking is on the unified salary schedule C, grade 5. The highest step is 20 with a pay of $202K.

A secondary high school principal is on the school-based administrator scale. The highest step is 20 with a pay of $226K.

[Anonymous]

he should have been fired and have $0 salary