yeah meaning the true average would be much much lower. Not a hater but lump this in with big TO schools like Colgate Wake Richmond and Nescacs - the TO experiment is over and it has failed. I get schools like Wake Wes and Bowdoin were TO long before the fad, but it does nobody any favors in terms of academic quality of the undergrad population |
| the achievements listed are also pretty mid - almost like the bottom 10% of kids at Sidwell who don’t even try |
| I don’t know that enrolling more students is necessarily a good thing. It strains resources. |
Correct. They over enrolled. That’s not a good thing. |
+ 1. |
True, with 68% submitting (19% submitting ACT), which actually is pretty high for a TO school. https://www.bucknell.edu/sites/default/files/institutional-research/common_data_set_2024-25.pdf |
|
Record freshman class enrollment by one (1)--yes, one student.
1,040 freshmen enrolled versus old record of 1,039. |
That only means that the real score is likely even lower than 1270, doofus. |
|
What college has more intrinsic humor possibilities on a board like this?
I mean, the name itself is hilarious: "Buck-nell" Always doomed to be confused with Cornell and Grinnell: "Bucknell? Isn't that in Nebraska or somewhere?" or "Bucknell? Oh yeah, I think I had a friend who went there to study hotel management." It's an off-brand version of the most off-brand Ivy League school and the most off-brand liberal arts college. And preposterously, no one has seen a bison in Pennsylvania since the end of the last ice age. So all hail Bucknell, the RC-Cola of selective colleges! If anyone has ever needed to experience the refreshing taste of Royal Crown, it's the brand obsessed people on this forum. |
Bucknell is much more nationally known than Grinnell. I've never run into a Grinnell grad on Wall Street unless it's at the coffee shop where they work as a barista while focusing on activism or that novel they keep meaning to finish. |
| They are over enrolling because the transfers out is particularly high. |
I went to Grinnell and agree that Bucknell probably has better name recognition with the general population than Grinnell, thanks to a D1 basketball program. I’d also agree that you’ll likely find a higher percentage of students who desire Wall Street jobs at Bucknell than Grinnell. I find it odd that PP can’t imagine options beyond Wall Street and barista, but whatever. I have never known anyone who confused Bucknell and Grinnell though it’s true that they both end in the same four letters. |
32% acceptance rate in 2023! I always thought Bucknell was competitive. |
Bull crap. Their most recent freshman retention rate is 94%. That's insanely high. The national average is 68%. |
It's highly competitive. The acceptance rate dropped to 29% in 2024. More than 7 out of 10 applicants were rejected. And that's with an applicant pool that is self-selective to begin with. It's not like Penn State where every high school graduate from Pennsylvania applies. |