BBC: Israeli defence minister plans to move Gaza's population to camps

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is there no NYT article on this? I don't see it anywhere on the main homepage. Too busy with breaking news about Zohran's college applications 15 yrs ago?

They are meeting on it now. Most likely looking through Nazi propaganda to just this.

[Anonymous]

Remember when the pro-Israel people were absolutely denying Israel would ever do this, and it's just about getting Hamas and the hostages back? It's just wild how obvious it was from the start that they were destroying every inch of that city to make it unlivable to prepare for a "humanitarian expulsion" while they denied it up and down.

At what point do these people start realizing how much this country lies? At what point do people realize Netanyahu enabled/allowed October 7 to happen as a pretext to execute their genocide and ethnic cleansing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember when the pro-Israel people were absolutely denying Israel would ever do this, and it's just about getting Hamas and the hostages back? It's just wild how obvious it was from the start that they were destroying every inch of that city to make it unlivable to prepare for a "humanitarian expulsion" while they denied it up and down.

At what point do these people start realizing how much this country lies? At what point do people realize Netanyahu enabled/allowed October 7 to happen as a pretext to execute their genocide and ethnic cleansing.

Nobody really believed that, though, did they?

"The enemy is not Hamas, nor is it the military wing of Hamas ... Every child in Gaza is the enemy. We need to occupy Gaza and settle it, and not a single Gazan child will be left there. There is no other victory."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they didn't want the terrain redeveloped for them, they should have given some thought to consequences before Oct. 7, eh?

Yes just like Israel should have not killed all those Palestinians before Oct 7, eh?

I think they got the hint after you and the tribe slaughtered 40,000 children, women, elderly, etc.

[Anonymous]

As an American Jew, I am horrified that the Israeli government has basically fallen to some of the worst attributes of the Nazi regime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As an American Jew, I am horrified that the Israeli government has basically fallen to some of the worst attributes of the Nazi regime.

It's not new.

[Anonymous]

If I were Gazan, I wouldn’t move to those camps. The camps will 100% get bombed. Every time Israel tells them to move somewhere else for safety, the place gets bombed. They might as well stay at home

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On the other hand, it might be more difficult to build terrorist infrastructure under tents, so there's that.

Meanwhile with 60% or so of the structures in Gaza already uninhabitable, and refugee camps a constant feature of Palestinian infrastructure since 1948, this doesn't seem like such Big News.

How are tents with a dirt floor more difficult to dig tunnels under? Seems like a refugee camp with nothing else to do makes an excellent breeding ground for creating a NEW Hamas if you ask me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On the other hand, it might be more difficult to build terrorist infrastructure under tents, so there's that.

Meanwhile with 60% or so of the structures in Gaza already uninhabitable, and refugee camps a constant feature of Palestinian infrastructure since 1948, this doesn't seem like such Big News.

How are tents with a dirt floor more difficult to dig tunnels under? Seems like a refugee camp with nothing else to do makes an excellent breeding ground for creating a NEW Hamas if you ask me.

Yes, and then Israel can bomb the tents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If I were Gazan, I wouldn’t move to those camps. The camps will 100% get bombed. Every time Israel tells them to move somewhere else for safety, the place gets bombed. They might as well stay at home

Stay at home and get taken out by drones or starve to death vs move to the concentration camp and maybe have a chance to not get bombed. Terrible situation either way, but it's all according to Israel's plans from the get go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember when the pro-Israel people were absolutely denying Israel would ever do this, and it's just about getting Hamas and the hostages back? It's just wild how obvious it was from the start that they were destroying every inch of that city to make it unlivable to prepare for a "humanitarian expulsion" while they denied it up and down.

At what point do these people start realizing how much this country lies? At what point do people realize Netanyahu enabled/allowed October 7 to happen as a pretext to execute their genocide and ethnic cleansing.

People are realizing it. Look at all the comments on the (many) NYT articles on Mamdani's views of Israel. The articles raise all these "concerns" with him but the commenters (NYT readers) are pushing back and bringing the conversation back to this.

[Anonymous]

Just like the nazis did. How much time will take until they start defending a "final solution" for Palestinian people?

[Anonymous]

Once the concentration is completed of course then they'll proceed to bomb the humanitarian zone and complete the genocide.

After all they've been spamming this strategy for decades.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is there no NYT article on this? I don't see it anywhere on the main homepage. Too busy with breaking news about Zohran's college applications 15 yrs ago?

The NYT has always had a strong pro-Israel bent. The few articles that they report on atrocities in Gaza are sort of “but both sides have suffered” spins-even though one side has suffered a whole lot more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is there no NYT article on this? I don't see it anywhere on the main homepage. Too busy with breaking news about Zohran's college applications 15 yrs ago?

The NYT has always had a strong pro-Israel bent. The few articles that they report on atrocities in Gaza are sort of “but both sides have suffered” spins-even though one side has suffered a whole lot more.

Because the side which started the war and lost deserves more sympathy than the side which was attacked? Please.