No. Chicago has a high yield rate because of ED0 (summer ED), ED1,ED2. 80% of the incoming class is through ED. That is not comparable to other tip top privates with one ED round that accounts for half or just less than half the class. |
Northeastern ahead of Williams or Amherst is not a big surprise. Majority of students don't even consider small liberal arts schools in the first place. |
Should calculate (non-ED Yield / non-ED Acceptance Rate) instead of (Yield / Acceptance Rate). |
+2 assessing based on selectivity is deeply ignorant and a poor substitute for assessing the actual quality of institutions, programs, majors, student life, etc. |
Ah yes, because it is definitely harder to get into the Good Samaritan College of Nursing and Health Science than Georgetown. |
Only an idiot would send their kid to Minerva University over many of the 'lower ranked' schools on this list, even Emory. |
Selectivity is the result of all applicants' collective assessment of quality of institutions, programs, majors, student life, etc. |
Even? Emory? You don't get tired of being a troll. |
Northeastern? Barnard? |
No it’s not. Many universities game selectivity. |
Barnard is an ivy. |
Anything not having UGA in the Top 5 seems ridiculous. |
That says Chicago is so popular that so many high caliber kids love to go there and are 100% sure Chicago is the best place. And Chicago has to open up 80% of the class to ED applicants, or they risk losing the best intellectuals to peer schools. |
Yes, this is one way to interpretat the result. High caliber students may still think Harvard is better but not significantly so that it's not worth giving it a small chance, and it's better to increase chance at UChicago. |
BTW UPenn and Ivies invented ED.
|