Trump and U.S. generals are weighing the use of a tactical nukes against Iran's Fordo facility

[Anonymous]

Trump loves war but only if he is in the White House underground bunker with it's very own McDonald's to feed him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Both Israel and the United States have dangerous fools in top positions. Trump and Netanyahu are dying to use a nuclear weapon. If only the two of them would the only ones who actually would die from their insanity.

If one nation has nuclear weapons then all nations should be allowed to have a nuclear arsenal.

Trump and Netanyahu won’t be alive when the repercussions of this return over our heads (literally). Persians don’t forget

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We will never use a nuke in this situation. Trump already nixed the idea. This is just idiots stirring things up. If Trump does anything - and I don't think he will in the end - it'll be the bunker busters on Fordow. Over and over again until it's gone. Followed by Israeli commandos to make sure.

But I don't think that's going to happen in the end. There will be a "deal." And IAEA will be let in again to dismantle the facility. The wild card of course is Khamenei, the 86 year old religious zealot that rules Iran. There really needs to be an international law that forbids geriatrics from having power. Just a straight up ban on everyone over the age of 70. So sick of the idiocy and nihilism of old people in world affairs deciding the fate of millions of younger people.

Khomeini is not the president. He’s a religious leader not a politician. People forget Iran actually has a heart surgeon moderate for a president named Masoud Pezekhian. It’s convenient for Israel to ignore him and focus on 86 year old khomeini because pezekhian is rational and highly educated unlike Trump and Bibi

[Anonymous]

This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article.

Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article.

Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal.

If accurate, I sure hope this has been communicated to Trump. And, that he listens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article.

Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal.

GBU most likely will not work. Though the Iranians say that want to negotiate AND MAKE A DEAL SIMILAR TO THE DEAL MADE BY OBAMA, THE UNITED NATIONS AND MOST OF EUROPE. This is the correct way forward. F the neocon and pro Israelis crowd.

Iran is not actively seeking nuclear weapons. They have not taken steps to produce a nuclear weapon. This has been the case for over a decade. Israel has victory disease and thinks it can get the US to attack Iran. It is time to muzzle Israel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article.

Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal.

GBU most likely will not work. Though the Iranians say that want to negotiate AND MAKE A DEAL SIMILAR TO THE DEAL MADE BY OBAMA, THE UNITED NATIONS AND MOST OF EUROPE. This is the correct way forward. F the neocon and pro Israelis crowd.

Iran is not actively seeking nuclear weapons. They have not taken steps to produce a nuclear weapon. This has been the case for over a decade. Israel has victory disease and thinks it can get the US to attack Iran. It is time to muzzle Israel.

Weapons engineering says otherwise, PP.

Also, don't say they won't work and in the same breath argue another treaty is better. I am not disagreeing with you about the value of diplomacy and negotiations. Just pointing out that it's obvious you're talking nonsense about a MOP just because you don't want to use it.

Argue better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article.

Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal.

GBU most likely will not work. Though the Iranians say that want to negotiate AND MAKE A DEAL SIMILAR TO THE DEAL MADE BY OBAMA, THE UNITED NATIONS AND MOST OF EUROPE. This is the correct way forward. F the neocon and pro Israelis crowd.

Iran is not actively seeking nuclear weapons. They have not taken steps to produce a nuclear weapon. This has been the case for over a decade. Israel has victory disease and thinks it can get the US to attack Iran. It is time to muzzle Israel.

Of course. All that highly enriched uranium was just a science experiment, since it has no civilian application. How could we not see the peaceful intent behind such activity, especially when combined with Iran's long-standing dedication to the eradication of Israel, the U.S. and other Western nations which fail to acknowledge the Islamic Republic's wonderfulness? A mere academic exercise, that's surely all those peaceful Islamists have been up to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article.

Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal.

GBU most likely will not work. Though the Iranians say that want to negotiate AND MAKE A DEAL SIMILAR TO THE DEAL MADE BY OBAMA, THE UNITED NATIONS AND MOST OF EUROPE. This is the correct way forward. F the neocon and pro Israelis crowd.

Iran is not actively seeking nuclear weapons. They have not taken steps to produce a nuclear weapon. This has been the case for over a decade. Israel has victory disease and thinks it can get the US to attack Iran. It is time to muzzle Israel.

Of course. All that highly enriched uranium was just a science experiment, since it has no civilian application. How could we not see the peaceful intent behind such activity, especially when combined with Iran's long-standing dedication to the eradication of Israel, the U.S. and other Western nations which fail to acknowledge the Islamic Republic's wonderfulness? A mere academic exercise, that's surely all those peaceful Islamists have been up to.

There isn’t a reliable source that said that they were close to a nuclear weapon, even comrade tulsi said so. Of course, the two of them might be getting their propaganda mixed up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article.

Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal.

GBU most likely will not work. Though the Iranians say that want to negotiate AND MAKE A DEAL SIMILAR TO THE DEAL MADE BY OBAMA, THE UNITED NATIONS AND MOST OF EUROPE. This is the correct way forward. F the neocon and pro Israelis crowd.

Iran is not actively seeking nuclear weapons. They have not taken steps to produce a nuclear weapon. This has been the case for over a decade. Israel has victory disease and thinks it can get the US to attack Iran. It is time to muzzle Israel.

Of course. All that highly enriched uranium was just a science experiment, since it has no civilian application. How could we not see the peaceful intent behind such activity, especially when combined with Iran's long-standing dedication to the eradication of Israel, the U.S. and other Western nations which fail to acknowledge the Islamic Republic's wonderfulness? A mere academic exercise, that's surely all those peaceful Islamists have been up to.

There isn’t a reliable source that said that they were close to a nuclear weapon, even comrade tulsi said so. Of course, the two of them might be getting their propaganda mixed up.

They are not close to a nuclear bomb, so Israel is manufacturing a false sense of urgency to distract from its Gazan destruction, and it seeking to exploit having a dunce in the White House.

BUT ALSO

It's obvious to anyone with two neurons to rub together that Iran's ultimate goal is a nuclear bomb. It's practically alone in a Middle East full of hostile nations! Anyone would want a bomb in the same circumstances.

AND ALSO

Another factor to consider is that at this specific moment in time, Iran is more fragile than usual because its proxies Hamas and Hezbollah have recently been significantly weakened by Israel (using billions of US dollars over many years to invest in Mossad and defense intelligence, as well as weapons). Hezbollah will regroup at some point, the wheel of fortune may change, etc... so is it now or never?

BOTTOM LINE : it's not as simple a dilemma as you might expect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article.

Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal.

GBU most likely will not work. Though the Iranians say that want to negotiate AND MAKE A DEAL SIMILAR TO THE DEAL MADE BY OBAMA, THE UNITED NATIONS AND MOST OF EUROPE. This is the correct way forward. F the neocon and pro Israelis crowd.

Iran is not actively seeking nuclear weapons. They have not taken steps to produce a nuclear weapon. This has been the case for over a decade. Israel has victory disease and thinks it can get the US to attack Iran. It is time to muzzle Israel.

Of course. All that highly enriched uranium was just a science experiment, since it has no civilian application. How could we not see the peaceful intent behind such activity, especially when combined with Iran's long-standing dedication to the eradication of Israel, the U.S. and other Western nations which fail to acknowledge the Islamic Republic's wonderfulness? A mere academic exercise, that's surely all those peaceful Islamists have been up to.

There isn’t a reliable source that said that they were close to a nuclear weapon, even comrade tulsi said so. Of course, the two of them might be getting their propaganda mixed up.

The IAEA has confirmed that Iran has been rapidly upgrading their uranium to weapons grade. And there's no confusion about that, regardless of what Tulsi says. Weapons grade uranium is very different than anything that might conceivably be used for peaceful or civilian use. Iran is the belligerent here. There's not a single country in the Middle East that wants to see Iran with a nuclear weapon. Iran made a mistake going for weapons grade uranium. The entire region wants to see that program obliterated. It's not coincidental that Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia are all helping Israel right now.

[Anonymous]

If we bomb a lot of enriched uranium, won't that cause an ecological disaster? All that uranium being exploded? I'm no expert, but it could be worse than Chernobyl, right? The heat would be worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
If we bomb a lot of enriched uranium, won't that cause an ecological disaster? All that uranium being exploded? I'm no expert, but it could be worse than Chernobyl, right? The heat would be worse.

I don't think Zionists really care. After all, they already drop 6 Nukes worth of bombs on Gaza in an area directly adjacent to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article.

Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal.

GBU most likely will not work. Though the Iranians say that want to negotiate AND MAKE A DEAL SIMILAR TO THE DEAL MADE BY OBAMA, THE UNITED NATIONS AND MOST OF EUROPE. This is the correct way forward. F the neocon and pro Israelis crowd.

Iran is not actively seeking nuclear weapons. They have not taken steps to produce a nuclear weapon. This has been the case for over a decade. Israel has victory disease and thinks it can get the US to attack Iran. It is time to muzzle Israel.

Of course. All that highly enriched uranium was just a science experiment, since it has no civilian application. How could we not see the peaceful intent behind such activity, especially when combined with Iran's long-standing dedication to the eradication of Israel, the U.S. and other Western nations which fail to acknowledge the Islamic Republic's wonderfulness? A mere academic exercise, that's surely all those peaceful Islamists have been up to.

There isn’t a reliable source that said that they were close to a nuclear weapon, even comrade tulsi said so. Of course, the two of them might be getting their propaganda mixed up.

The IAEA has confirmed that Iran has been rapidly upgrading their uranium to weapons grade. And there's no confusion about that, regardless of what Tulsi says. Weapons grade uranium is very different than anything that might conceivably be used for peaceful or civilian use. Iran is the belligerent here. There's not a single country in the Middle East that wants to see Iran with a nuclear weapon. Iran made a mistake going for weapons grade uranium. The entire region wants to see that program obliterated. It's not coincidental that Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia are all helping Israel right now.

It’s fine, she got her new talking points.

BREAKING: In stunning turnaround DNI Tulsi Gabbard makes 180 degree shift on Iran, says “America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly”

Why might this be?

“The major step is the culmination of several festering stand-offs between the International Atomic Energy Agency and Iran that have arisen since President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of a nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers in 2018 during his first term, after which that deal unravelled.”

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/iaea-board-declares-iran-breach-non-proliferation-duties-diplomats-say-2025-06-12/

Is probably want a nuke too if I was surrounded by belligerents.

[Anonymous]

With the enriched uranium, it would not take long to make a bomb.

However, I don't really think we are considering a tactical nuclear bomb to drop.
However, I live with someone with some real life experience in studying fall out. and he says that fallout would not be a big issue if it were deep in the ground. But, he also does not believe they will use one.