Reply to Trump and U.S. generals are weighing the use of a tactical nukes against Iran's Fordo facility

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump and U.S. generals are weighing the use of a tactical nukes against Iran's Fordo facility"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article.

Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal.

[/quote]

GBU most likely will not work. Though the Iranians say that want to negotiate AND MAKE A DEAL SIMILAR TO THE DEAL MADE BY OBAMA, THE UNITED NATIONS AND MOST OF EUROPE. This is the correct way forward. F the neocon and pro Israelis crowd.

Iran is not actively seeking nuclear weapons. They have not taken steps to produce a nuclear weapon. This has been the case for over a decade. Israel has victory disease and thinks it can get the US to attack Iran. It is time to muzzle Israel. [/quote]

Of course.  All that highly enriched uranium was just a science experiment, since it has no civilian application.  How could we not see the peaceful intent behind such activity, especially when combined with Iran's long-standing dedication to the eradication of Israel, the U.S. and other Western nations which fail to acknowledge the Islamic Republic's wonderfulness?  A mere academic exercise, that's surely all those peaceful Islamists have been up to.  [/quote]

There isn’t a reliable source that said that they were close to a nuclear weapon, even comrade tulsi said so.  Of course, the two of them might be getting  their propaganda mixed up.[/quote]

The IAEA has confirmed that Iran has been rapidly upgrading their uranium to weapons grade. And there's no confusion about that, regardless of what Tulsi says. Weapons grade uranium is very different than anything that might conceivably be used for peaceful or civilian use. Iran is the belligerent here. There's not a single country in the Middle East that wants to see Iran with a nuclear weapon. Iran made a mistake going for weapons grade uranium. The entire region wants to see that program obliterated. It's not coincidental that Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia are all helping Israel right now. [/quote]

It’s fine, she got her new talking points.

BREAKING: In stunning turnaround DNI Tulsi Gabbard makes 180 degree shift on Iran, says “America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly”

Why might this be?

“The major step is the culmination of several festering stand-offs between the International Atomic Energy Agency and Iran that have arisen since President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of a nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers in 2018 during his first term, after which that deal unravelled.”

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/iaea-board-declares-iran-breach-non-proliferation-duties-diplomats-say-2025-06-12/

Is probably want a nuke too if I was surrounded by belligerents.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics