Common sense prevails at the S.Ct. and Mexico loses

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Remember, if you say "Free Palestine" you are the same as a Hamas baby beheader, but if you manufacturer semiautomatic rifles to illegally ship to Mexico, you're a good person. This is an invasion of Mexico by US forces.


Did the manufacturers illegally ship their guns to Mexico?


Nah just send it to a third party (like how they do with Israel for example) and then they can ship them to terrorists, war criminals and dictators. EZ money and nothing illegal about it.


The ATF has line of sight to every entity a firearms manufacturer ships their product to. Your post is ridiculous.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Gun manufacturers should be responsible for people murdered by their product. AR15's are military grade weapons intended for only one purpose: to kill humans!


Sorry, not the only use. Many people who live in what DCUMers like to call fly over states use them to deal with varmints such as coyotes and wolves that threaten their livestock.

Also used in recreational shooting events such as 2-Gun Action Shooting, etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Gun manufacturers should be responsible for their guns that are stolen after they sell them to a licensed retailer that sells them to a US citizen. How can the highest court in the land be so stupid?


How can you be so stupid? What about vehicles or knives, they have been used by mentally unstable individuals to kill and injure innocent people.

I get it, you hate guns, but it was very difficult for a private citizen to own a gun in Israel before 10/7. The people relied on the state to protect them, but that didn’t work. So now the government has relaxed gun township restrictions and people are arming themselves.


Do you ever stop to consider what the fate of some civilian shooting at terrorists with a personal weapon would face? Do you have any actual experience facing off with roving bands of heavily armed terrorists in your front yard?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Gun manufacturers should be responsible for their guns that are stolen after they sell them to a licensed retailer that sells them to a US citizen. How can the highest court in the land be so stupid?


How can you be so stupid? What about vehicles or knives, they have been used by mentally unstable individuals to kill and injure innocent people.

I get it, you hate guns, but it was very difficult for a private citizen to own a gun in Israel before 10/7. The people relied on the state to protect them, but that didn’t work. So now the government has relaxed gun township restrictions and people are arming themselves.


Do you ever stop to consider what the fate of some civilian shooting at terrorists with a personal weapon would face? Do you have any actual experience facing off with roving bands of heavily armed terrorists in your front yard?


Yes. I did 4 tours with JSOC for Operation Enduring Freedom. I’m still alive and many terrorists aren’t.
Anonymous
Mexico should put inbound traffic from the U.S. through the same rigorous screening process as cars heading back to the U.S.

They’d catch a lot of firearm traffickers and can imprison them. My guess is that a lot gun running Americans would be rotting in Mexican prisons.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Gun manufacturers should be responsible for their guns that are stolen after they sell them to a licensed retailer that sells them to a US citizen. How can the highest court in the land be so stupid?


How can you be so stupid? What about vehicles or knives, they have been used by mentally unstable individuals to kill and injure innocent people.

I get it, you hate guns, but it was very difficult for a private citizen to own a gun in Israel before 10/7. The people relied on the state to protect them, but that didn’t work. So now the government has relaxed gun township restrictions and people are arming themselves.


Do you ever stop to consider what the fate of some civilian shooting at terrorists with a personal weapon would face? Do you have any actual experience facing off with roving bands of heavily armed terrorists in your front yard?


Owning a gun isn’t enough, one also has to train and become proficient. A reasonably trained armed civilian would stand a decent chance against opportunistic terrorists. A far better chance than an unarmed civilian would.
Anonymous
My party, AR-15.
Your party, broken voting machine.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: