+1 (except I did stints of public interest law as well). I never had any interest in working for a biglaw firm. Looking back, I think I could have broadened my horizons a little to look at in house jobs, but I still wouldn’t be primarily motivated by money. |
Yes it is interesting legal work. and a lot of the dudes who left the agencies to law firms to claim they “know all the people, practices and regs” don’t actually know all that much … they are just good at selling that perception to clients. But when they come talk to me it’s pretty clear they don’t have any sort of special chops that you couldn’t get by just … reading the regulations and being a person with basic social skills. The best BigLaw person I work with was not revolving door but is just really smart and good at making connections. |
| It's a great quality of life job. |
Not to mention the connections. Going from the SEC to private practice or Big Law to defend the bad people is pretty common. When wondering, money is almost always the answer. Lawyers are mercenaries. They chase the dollars. |
Ummmm --- why do you think they rep bad people? I doubt most of them do. |
| Two married fin reg lawyers make $500,000 to $600,000 per year if not more. How much more reasonable and predictable hours than private practice, do interesting and challenging legal work for the most part, and, assuming they have chosen their path according to their beliefs, have careers, dedicated to productive and positive public service. And a reasonable amount of time left in their lives for time with family, social lives, athletics, what have you. Also, the ones I knew do outside activities on community service boards and alike so use their skills for good public impact. I went a different direction, But I think it’s a really nice option for smart people wanting to do good while maintaining balance for a family, another activities. |
+1. All of this. I left a fancy firm and was so much happier until the DOGE business happened. It’s so many reasons: Sense of mission. (No longer defending wealthy bad actors or working for toxic partners who are work-obsessed.) Work-life balance. (I actually see my family and take real vacations.) Relatively (for public sector) well-paid, with decent benefits. Flexibility— could telework or do an AWS. It’s a great job for a well-credentialed person who wants to do good work and also enjoy their life. Or it was. |
| My friend went into FinReg after making partner for the work life balance. |
| Wanted to do interesting work that I thought helped the world and my DH is a biglaw partner so one of us has to actually be here for the kids. Probably going to leave soon because of the current environment. |
| Oh and my neighbor did the same and then transitioned into private practice and is now a partner at her firm. |
It's unclear what the end has to do with everything that came before. Barnes doesn't make the connection. I think what he intended to say was, Yale Law School grads understand that "rent seeking" / biglaw is a losing game. |
Not at regulatory agencies. They have separate scales that are higher. That’s why SEC attorneys can make much more than DOJ. |
Yep, that's us. I'm at finreg equivalent of 15 and H is in private sector. We make around 600k and we have a very comfortable life. We also have family resources, so don't need to work crazy hours. |
|
I worked in a professional role supporting attorneys. They have it easy in these places and are well paid. Many have been there for years and do little.
DOGE recently got rid of paralegals, librarians and secretaries in the agency but left the attorneys untouched - even the ones who could retire. So places are afraid of them too. But readily go after others. |