Trump’s latest tantrum - terrorize SC Justices

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When it was people imprisoned over January 6th, Supreme Court let them sit in prison for years while the district courts and appeals courts reviewed the details and formed decisions before eventually saying the Sarbanes Oxley charges did not apply to these cases.

When it was illegal immigrants, the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped deportations within 24 hours, without even having jurisdiction.

You really cannot tell the difference between seditionists and people who are entitled to due process under the US Constitution before being sent to a gulag, you know, to make sure the people being sent away aren't legally here and not guilty of any crimes?

Are you saying J6er didn’t deserve due process? Because allowing citizens to rot in jail for years while things wind through court is what you are advocating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When it was people imprisoned over January 6th, Supreme Court let them sit in prison for years while the district courts and appeals courts reviewed the details and formed decisions before eventually saying the Sarbanes Oxley charges did not apply to these cases.

When it was illegal immigrants, the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped deportations within 24 hours, without even having jurisdiction.

You really cannot tell the difference between seditionists and people who are entitled to due process under the US Constitution before being sent to a gulag, you know, to make sure the people being sent away aren't legally here and not guilty of any crimes?

Are you saying J6er didn’t deserve due process? Because allowing citizens to rot in jail for years while things wind through court is what you are advocating.

It's not the fault of the courts that hundreds of J6ers all joined in the insurrection party, creating a huge backlog of cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is poster child for leopards eating faces party.

I wonder if Roberts is regretting letting Trump off the the classified documents case or the J6 case now?

No it's not. What a dumb take. Both of those cases were dismissed because the DOJ moved at a glacial pace and Trump was re-elected.

This is authoritarianism 101 - break institutions that won't bend to your will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is losing it. This morning he retweeted on Truth Social an old conspiracy theory about the Clinton murdering people, like JFK Jr.

He is becoming the Nation’s demented grandpa.

yup or the embarrassing, uneducated, racist, dirty uncle at the table.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is poster child for leopards eating faces party.

I wonder if Roberts is regretting letting Trump off the the classified documents case or the J6 case now?

No it's not. What a dumb take. Both of those cases were dismissed because the DOJ moved at a glacial pace and Trump was re-elected.

This is authoritarianism 101 - break institutions that won't bend to your will.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When it was people imprisoned over January 6th, Supreme Court let them sit in prison for years while the district courts and appeals courts reviewed the details and formed decisions before eventually saying the Sarbanes Oxley charges did not apply to these cases.

When it was illegal immigrants, the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped deportations within 24 hours, without even having jurisdiction.

I guess that even the corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court are starting to realize that Donald Trump doesn't show any loyalty to people who protect him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When it was people imprisoned over January 6th, Supreme Court let them sit in prison for years while the district courts and appeals courts reviewed the details and formed decisions before eventually saying the Sarbanes Oxley charges did not apply to these cases.

When it was illegal immigrants, the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped deportations within 24 hours, without even having jurisdiction.

I guess that even the corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court are starting to realize that Donald Trump doesn't show any loyalty to people who protect him.

"Corrupt Republicans"? How incredibly childish that when you don't get your way (a packed, all-liberal SC), you call anyone who disagrees with you, "corrupt." Grow the hell up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When it was people imprisoned over January 6th, Supreme Court let them sit in prison for years while the district courts and appeals courts reviewed the details and formed decisions before eventually saying the Sarbanes Oxley charges did not apply to these cases.

When it was illegal immigrants, the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped deportations within 24 hours, without even having jurisdiction.

I guess that even the corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court are starting to realize that Donald Trump doesn't show any loyalty to people who protect him.

"Corrupt Republicans"? How incredibly childish that when you don't get your way (a packed, all-liberal SC), you call anyone who disagrees with you, "corrupt." Grow the hell up.

Dp. I don't think Gorusch, Barrett are corrupt. I didn't think Scalia was corrupt. ALito and Thomas and probably Kavanaugh are awash in corruption. Like, coated with the stink. It is nothing but basic denialism to not see it. You should grow up.