It’s likely not allergies as it’s not seasonal and is the same when we travel anywhere. The issues are constant and do bother her a lot. |
Yikes!! |
That is about MRI and not CT scan. |
|
The article discusses the variability between machines and ionizing radiation. Check with your provider to see if they are doing their best to reduce what is required.
Remember, flying exposed you to the same type of radiation. |
| Also- remember that cancer patients, those with autoimmune issues like Crohns, those with head injuries, etc., are scanned frequently- sometimes yearly . |
… which increases their cancer risk. |
I assume all the same Jama Study https://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/ct-scan-cancer-ucsf-study-20271473.php |
Ugh my doctor is pushing for MRI with contrast or a full body CT and now I just don’t know which is worth it. |
Ct is much easier and safer. |
Still low. And people fly all the time. |
Correct. Someone posted that MRI’s are safer but the contrast used with MRI’s causes some people a lifetime of problems. |
| Yes, and this doesn’t really justify a CT scan. I wouldn’t do it. |
| I've had two sinus CT scans and would not hesitate to have another. The risks are so minim. |
|
“CT scans use ionizing radiation, which can potentially increase the risk of cancer, especially with multiple or high-dose scans. Contrast dye used in some CT scans can also have side effects, including kidney issues or allergic reactions. While the radiation dose from a typical CT scan is considered low, the cumulative effect over time and in certain populations, like children, is a concern.”
I’d only do a CT scan for my child if absolutely life or limb saving |
| The CT scan would not worry me. |