If you're traditional, I do hope you are staying in a hotel. Staying with your gentleman friend would be most improper. |
You pay yourself. |
One who chooses to travel. |
And here goes equality. |
Doesn't matter. |
So they are “inviting” the other party to spend? Who pays for lodging ? It’s totally free to date in own neighborhood why would invitee even go, then ? |
| If it's a vacation, split. If it's accompanying your bf/gf to like, a family wedding that you wouldn't otherwise go to, they should pay. |
And if you mooch, you're just not that into them but their money. |
Why and how is that fair that the marginal cost of a poorer individual to date someone that wealthy is incredibly high ? And for the wealthier it’s practically free. I would be offended if I traveled with a partner and he went to 1st class and I would go to economy (which I a could afford). That tells me they don’t care at all. Equality is not about 50/50 or each paying theirs way. It’s about fair distribution of responsibilities and costs. |
If invitee can't afford they shouldn't go. |
I have nothing to gain economically from them getting an avia ticket. Otherwise I can just sit back home and in fact make more money working my 2 side gigs. |
| Just make up your mind, equality or free lunch. |
Yep, that’s what I did. Just stayed back home and offered him to visit. Turned out he came to visit, wanted sex but was too cheap to invite for a proper dinner. I just dumped him |
Equality is not about 50/50. If they make $1m and the other party makes 100k then they should pay 9/10th of expenses in that couple This would be equality: pro-rata contributing |
+1 But if one person is substantially wealthier, they may want to just do all the paying because (1) they can, and (2) it means you can go nicer places. If it's flying back and forth to visit someone - the default would be to pay for your own travel, but, again, if the other person makes a lot more than you'd probably expect them to offer to pay more of those expenses. If they don't - yeah, move on. TRUST ME on that one. |