JFK Files to be released today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this just what he says now every time he wants to shout "squirrel!" Shiny thing over there!

This. He’s been touting this for so long now. Trump hasn’t left the 70s in NYC. High crime, studio 54, urban flight. And the adulation of the Kennedy family - the Catholic outsiders who were loved and lionized. Just like Trump wants more than anything.

Exactly! Trump, as a lifelong Democrat up until 20 years ago, wanted the Trumps to become the Kennedys. When he chose to dive into politics, the power vacuum was within the GOP so he made the switch and gained traction as the "outsider". Now he is just as much DC swamp scum as Biden was.

[Anonymous]

Release full, unredacted Epstein files. And not another lame, partial, redacted Bonding release of stuff we already saw.

[Anonymous]

Bondi

[Anonymous]

I have bad news. A single, mentally ill man named Oswald fired three shots and killed JFK. There’s nothing more to it, and hasn’t been for the last sixty years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have bad news. A single, mentally ill man named Oswald fired three shots and killed JFK. There’s nothing more to it, and hasn’t been for the last sixty years.

And any evidence remotely suggesting otherwise was probably tossed into a fire decades ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who knew how corrupt our CIA has been all these years?

I'm not certain the CIA was the big troublemaker in domestic unrest, rather the FBI was the instigator, and the COINTELPRO program is public knowledge at this point.

Now if you are talking about JFKs use of the US Mobsters (Giancana et al., working with the CIA to bump off Castro) obviously didn't work, well that's another story, but even that is public information at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bondi

They’re really throwing her under the bus. Too bad she’s a DEI hire. If it was Gaetz they’d go easier on him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What are you all expecting? I have to admit that I'm skeptical that any truly revelatory evidence remains -- I think it was all destroyed long ago. Nonetheless, this has been a subject that has interested me for decades and I do feel unexpectedly strong emotions that whatever evidence is left will finally be released and we will have at least some sense of closure.

The CIA has had literally decades to doctor the evidence and hide the involvement they may have had.

I’m expecting a nothing-burger to be released today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have bad news. A single, mentally ill man named Oswald fired three shots and killed JFK. There’s nothing more to it, and hasn’t been for the last sixty years.

And any evidence remotely suggesting otherwise was probably tossed into a fire decades ago.

Nah. There is plenty of evidence out there showing that it was extremely unlikely there was a lone gunman. It's just people have not been paying attention -- and still don't seem to want to, which I don't get.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are you all expecting? I have to admit that I'm skeptical that any truly revelatory evidence remains -- I think it was all destroyed long ago. Nonetheless, this has been a subject that has interested me for decades and I do feel unexpectedly strong emotions that whatever evidence is left will finally be released and we will have at least some sense of closure.

The CIA has had literally decades to doctor the evidence and hide the involvement they may have had.

I’m expecting a nothing-burger to be released today.

I agree nothing will be clear cut. But all the JFK researchers need is a few more bread crumbs to make some more headway -- and they have made lots of headway already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi

They’re really throwing her under the bus. Too bad she’s a DEI hire. If it was Gaetz they’d go easier on him.

Will she be Scaramucci #1 of this administration?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have bad news. A single, mentally ill man named Oswald fired three shots and killed JFK. There’s nothing more to it, and hasn’t been for the last sixty years.

And any evidence remotely suggesting otherwise was probably tossed into a fire decades ago.

Nah. There is plenty of evidence out there showing that it was extremely unlikely there was a lone gunman. It's just people have not been paying attention -- and still don't seem to want to, which I don't get.

What was their agenda? Did they even prevail?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi

They’re really throwing her under the bus. Too bad she’s a DEI hire. If it was Gaetz they’d go easier on him.

Will she be Scaramucci #1 of this administration?

No, she's been doing a fantastic job and she's straight out of central casting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is Trump so obsessed with JFK?

Birds of a feather...

[Anonymous]

JFK died 60 years ago.

Maybe some rogue govt entities killed him.

But during around that same time gov was responsible for many Black deaths, segregation, Tuskegee Syphallis, radiation experiments on unwitting citizens, the Vietnam War, COINTELPRO, forced sterilization.

This is almost a footnote to the horror of the 60s, and probably turned around when Pentsgon Papers and Watergate finally brought light to things and allowed the 5th estate to keep tabs on things. Of course, now I fear news media has been co-opted by those same bad elements, but that’s a tomorrow problem.