why do people here think a land grant college is somehow inferior?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The resources that a private school
can give each student are far superior in most cases except the very top land grants (ucb, uva, mich, cornell the partial public)

UVA and Michigan are not land grant universities.

You can find a list of all land grant schools here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_land-grant_universities

according to this link, scroll to Mass. MIT is a land grant.

And?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The resources that a private school
can give each student are far superior in most cases except the very top land grants (ucb, uva, mich, cornell the partial public)

UVA and Michigan are not land grant universities.

You can find a list of all land grant schools here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_land-grant_universities

according to this link, scroll to Mass. MIT is a land grant.

And?

No one thinks land grants are inferior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The resources that a private school
can give each student are far superior in most cases except the very top land grants (ucb, uva, mich, cornell the partial public)

You think MIT can't give kids opportunities?

I think MIT is a landgrant.

that's what I'm saying. it's ridiculous to say land grant dont have the same opportunities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The resources that a private school
can give each student are far superior in most cases except the very top land grants (ucb, uva, mich, cornell the partial public)

You are dreaming. I see no difference (one at OOS flagship one at private). Both have overcrowded and old dorm situations, both were put on WL for classes they wanted and ended up getting into the classes they wanted once movement started happening for freshman and sophomore years, both have had great counselors/advisors, both have gotten what they needed (different things) from the disability services office, both have things they like and things they hate about the meal plans/swipes.

+1. This is one of the many things that only exists in the minds of DCUMers, not reality.

[Anonymous]

DCUM thinks Cornell is some kind of quasi public school because part of it is land grant, which is bizarre

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DCUM thinks Cornell is some kind of quasi public school because part of it is land grant, which is bizarre

No, we think it is a quasi-public school because it is a quasi-public school.

[Anonymous]

DCUM is full of snobs and climbers. That’s why.

[Anonymous]

https://www.landgrabu.org

[Anonymous]

Check the other 500 threads on the exact same topic if you want to "get it".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DCUM is full of snobs and climbers. That’s why.

This!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.landgrabu.org

Yes, the entire USA was stolen from native tribes, so that includes the land-grant universities. Don't need a website to explain that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DCUM thinks Cornell is some kind of quasi public school because part of it is land grant, which is bizarre

It literally contains a public school.
Nothing bizarre about it.

[Anonymous]

Harvard is a land-grant college, but it eas established before the USA so it's not covered by the "USA land-grant colleges" law.

https://www.harvard.edu/about/history/timeline/#1600s

[Anonymous]

UMich was also a land grant, but established by a different law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:UMich was also a land grant, but established by a different law.

UMich is not a land grant university. I hope this clears things up.