So... Is SCOTUS really corrupt enough to hand Trump the country?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep corruption abounds. However, I'm not sure what you do with Trump now in office? I mean if you take him away we're left with Vance. With a straight face, I ask you, how is that psycho any better? I actually suggest he's worse. And say you take him away somehow. This admin won the vote. How do you actually legit justify taking down the admin? I mean they've made a lot of noise and chaos but in terms of starting a war or revolution, I'm not seeing it? Don't get me wrong, they're gross and I didn't vote for Trump but I'm just saying, how do you square taking Trump and Vance and the next GOP like them down from a practical perspective? You really can't have a new election just because you disagree with this admin because every admin has dissenters. He's made a lot of noise on paper but other than giving Musk access, that's really a judgement call.

JD doesn't have any morals. He blows with the wind of public opinion. An impeachment would scare him.

I am not sure how his marriage survives the company he keeps.

She’s just as bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they will rule that a district judge can mandate Trump must continue spending even though he has found fraudulent transactions.

You don’t? Pls see the Impoundment Act which does just that. If Congress appropriated the money he cannot just decide not to spend it.

Many Presidents have done that. It has never been decided by the Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only thing the Supreme Court loves more than Trump’s power is their own power.

+1 they may dig deep to find a basis to support his policies, but they aren’t rolling over.

[Anonymous]

I think Alito and Thomas are no hopers. I think Roberts preserves the court and won’t. Most likely to vote to preserve the constitution will be Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch in that order. Not counting on it, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they will rule that a district judge can mandate Trump must continue spending even though he has found fraudulent transactions.

You don’t? Pls see the Impoundment Act which does just that. If Congress appropriated the money he cannot just decide not to spend it.

Many Presidents have done that. It has never been decided by the Supreme Court.

Correct. He is testing whether Congress can tie his hands when it comes to spending money that it appropriated. It will be up to the Supreme Court to determine where the line is under the Constitution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Alito and Thomas are no hopers. I think Roberts preserves the court and won’t. Most likely to vote to preserve the constitution will be Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch in that order. Not counting on it, though.

Barrett won't play along with Trump. She'll side with Roberts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Alito and Thomas are no hopers. I think Roberts preserves the court and won’t. Most likely to vote to preserve the constitution will be Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch in that order. Not counting on it, though.

Agree. As much as I disagree with Barrett and resent the confirmation of Kavanaugh, I have found them both to be quite reasonable except on Roe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they will rule that a district judge can mandate Trump must continue spending even though he has found fraudulent transactions.

Fraudulent? Really? Name one.

Lots of expenditures that appear silly or misguided or that the right just doesn't like, but I have yet to see one reported that is in fact fraudulent. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't make it fraudulent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep corruption abounds. However, I'm not sure what you do with Trump now in office? I mean if you take him away we're left with Vance. With a straight face, I ask you, how is that psycho any better? I actually suggest he's worse. And say you take him away somehow. This admin won the vote. How do you actually legit justify taking down the admin? I mean they've made a lot of noise and chaos but in terms of starting a war or revolution, I'm not seeing it? Don't get me wrong, they're gross and I didn't vote for Trump but I'm just saying, how do you square taking Trump and Vance and the next GOP like them down from a practical perspective? You really can't have a new election just because you disagree with this admin because every admin has dissenters. He's made a lot of noise on paper but other than giving Musk access, that's really a judgement call.

JD doesn't have any morals. He blows with the wind of public opinion. An impeachment would scare him.

I am not sure how his marriage survives the company he keeps.

These women are all in on it. Look at Melania.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Alito and Thomas are no hopers. I think Roberts preserves the court and won’t. Most likely to vote to preserve the constitution will be Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch in that order. Not counting on it, though.

Barrett won't play along with Trump. She'll side with Roberts.

I think you're right. There's a lot riding on it though.

[Anonymous]

Yep
SCOTUS Catholic Is about to make Musk King
Humphrey Excecutur vs US

They will over turn this 100 year old case-
Giving Trump powers to he King ie Musk

Republicans are morons

Catholics won
Thomas, Alito ,GORSH,,KAVANAUGH, Barrett five if the justices that gave him immunity are catholics.


The US is gone and so is everu dime you ever made.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they will rule that a district judge can mandate Trump must continue spending even though he has found fraudulent transactions.

You don’t? Pls see the Impoundment Act which does just that. If Congress appropriated the money he cannot just decide not to spend it.

You want fraud? You don’t care if Congressional members get rich on your dime? Really?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only thing the Supreme Court loves more than Trump’s power is their own power.

+1 they may dig deep to find a basis to support his policies, but they aren’t rolling over.

BS they already pulled the Humphrys case

Republicans who voted in this shit have ended the US

I can not wait till the light bulb moment and they are living in a hellhole of their own making

In a few weeks the government will shut for good.march 14 musk is not letting them keep the government open . If you have travel plans don't worry about them.being refunded there will be no dollar Chinaknows this is coming and they are ready

Then he is going to destroy the dollar

Yes this what will be you re not paying attention

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Alito and Thomas are no hopers. I think Roberts preserves the court and won’t. Most likely to vote to preserve the constitution will be Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch in that order. Not counting on it, though.

Barrett won't play along with Trump. She'll side with Roberts.

I think so. She has some wacky ideas but I think she is quite principled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It looks like Trump is testing the guardrails of american democracy.

The senate is never going to convict, clearly impeachment is off the table until at least 2026 unless trump starts a civil war or something.
The judiciary is our only hope, there are a bunch of cases that have gone against trump at the district and appellate levels, these cases are going to go up to the supreme court.
JD Vance has already indicated that this administration might just ignore the supreme court if they rule against the administration.
Do you guys really think SCOTUS is corrupt and is going to hand the country over to Trump?

I don't think the Supreme Court is actually corrupt but we live in strange times

The irony is that if SCOTUS gives in to Trump, they will diminish their own power.