DOGE tells banks goal is to eliminate federal agencies and 75% of fed workforce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not what the linked article says.

"DOGE has goals of eliminating entire federal agencies and cutting three quarters of federal government jobs."

This is directly from the article.

Where do you see 75%?

What does three quarters equal?

[Anonymous]

Wake up people.....

The have the project 2025 guy in charge of CFPB. Trump signed an EO killing the digital dollar and embracing crypto.

They're removing all regulations preventing the injection of crypto into banking. They're closing 75% of agencies down and are in the Treasury so no one can stop them. Before you know it, the country is no longer using the dollar. Any savings you have thet are denominated in dollars will be worthless. All of the already billionaires will become even more rich since they own crypto and they killed the entire country's ability to retain effective use of the fiat dollar.

We sre all screwed. Our life savings will become worthless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not what the linked article says.

"DOGE has goals of eliminating entire federal agencies and cutting three quarters of federal government jobs."

This is directly from the article.

Where do you see 75%?

What does three quarters equal?

75% is a hard number, three quarters is politspeak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not what the linked article says.

"DOGE has goals of eliminating entire federal agencies and cutting three quarters of federal government jobs."

This is directly from the article.

Where do you see 75%?

Do you really not know how to translate the words 'three quarters' into numerical form?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not what the linked article says.

"DOGE has goals of eliminating entire federal agencies and cutting three quarters of federal government jobs."

This is directly from the article.

Where do you see 75%?

Do you really not know how to translate the words 'three quarters' into numerical form?

75% is a hard number, three quarters is politspeak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not what the linked article says.

"DOGE has goals of eliminating entire federal agencies and cutting three quarters of federal government jobs."

This is directly from the article.

Where do you see 75%?

What does three quarters equal?

75% is a hard number, three quarters is politspeak.

Trump voters, everyone….
“Math is hard”.

[Anonymous]

Here are departments and agencies by number of employees. Where would you make the cuts? About 1.6 million or 75% are the top 8. Those are all republicans honey holes. MAGA loves their socialism and government jobs.

Department of Veterans Affairs
486,522
Department of Homeland Security
222,539
Department of the Army
221,037
Department of the Navy
216,537
Department of the Air Force
168,505
Department of Defense
156,803
Department of Agriculture
92,072
Department of the Interior
62,890
Department of Heath and Human Services
91,058
Social Security Administration
59,227
Department of Justice
116,614
Department of the Treasury
108,869
Department of Transportation
55,806
Department of Commerce
47,650
EnvironmentalProtection Agency
16,450
Department of State
14,316
Department of Labor
14,730
General Services Administration
12,939
Small Business Administration
7,925
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
18,073
Department of Energy
16,846
Department of Housing and Urban Development
8,825
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
6,189
Agencies and departments with fewer than 5,000 employees are shown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:See here:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/musk-speaks-jpmorgan-event-attended-by-ceo-dimon-source-says-2025-02-07/

Why is JP Morgan getting briefings from Musk about DOGE but Congress can't? Why is the White House and Musk lying to the American people about what he's doing at DOGE when banks are getting the truth?

can someone explain why Democrats allowed open borders and alienated the US voters? why did Biden and Pelosi want to lose the election? I still don't get it. why they didn't see the anger and despair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:See here:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/musk-speaks-jpmorgan-event-attended-by-ceo-dimon-source-says-2025-02-07/

Why is JP Morgan getting briefings from Musk about DOGE but Congress can't? Why is the White House and Musk lying to the American people about what he's doing at DOGE when banks are getting the truth?

can someone explain why Democrats allowed open borders and alienated the US voters? why did Biden and Pelosi want to lose the election? I still don't get it. why they didn't see the anger and despair.

Haha, nice try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:See here:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/musk-speaks-jpmorgan-event-attended-by-ceo-dimon-source-says-2025-02-07/

Why is JP Morgan getting briefings from Musk about DOGE but Congress can't? Why is the White House and Musk lying to the American people about what he's doing at DOGE when banks are getting the truth?

can someone explain why Democrats allowed open borders and alienated the US voters? why did Biden and Pelosi want to lose the election? I still don't get it. why they didn't see the anger and despair.

Off topic. They are not in control. Go clean up your mess, MAGA, or we'll all have a ruined economy to deal with, which will cause a lot more anger and despair than Biden ever did.

[Anonymous]

DOGE’s goal is to right-size our government. It’s pretty obvious, just from their audit of USAID, that there is a lot of waste and excess in our government.

Does it add up to 75%? I doubt even DOGE knows until they conduct a similar audit of every agency, but it is a good enough starting point and is consistent with the results of their USAID audit that found definitively that only 294 positions out of 10,000 (or less then 3% of total staff) were necessary to actualize the goals set and established by Congress.

As an aside, it’s wonderful watching how open and transparent this administration has been compared to decades of hidden agendas, shadowy work practices, and corrupt leadership. As someone who hated Trump during his first term, it’s lovely seeing him growing into a great American leader up there with Reagan, Lincoln, and Washington

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not what the linked article says.

"DOGE has goals of eliminating entire federal agencies and cutting three quarters of federal government jobs."

This is directly from the article.

Where do you see 75%?

What does three quarters equal?

3/4 = eliminate 1,800,000 federal jobs.

The economy only creates 143,000 jobs last months which was a long month(4 1/2 weeks). At that rate it would take a 1.5 years to replace those workers(with mostly lose wage jobs).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not what the linked article says.

"DOGE has goals of eliminating entire federal agencies and cutting three quarters of federal government jobs."

This is directly from the article.

Where do you see 75%?

What does three quarters equal?

75% is a hard number, three quarters is politspeak.

Trump voters, everyone….
“Math is hard”.

It is quite an experience to have intellectual superiority modeled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DOGE’s goal is to right-size our government. It’s pretty obvious, just from their audit of USAID, that there is a lot of waste and excess in our government.

Does it add up to 75%? I doubt even DOGE knows until they conduct a similar audit of every agency, but it is a good enough starting point and is consistent with the results of their USAID audit that found definitively that only 294 positions out of 10,000 (or less then 3% of total staff) were necessary to actualize the goals set and established by Congress.

As an aside, it’s wonderful watching how open and transparent this administration has been compared to decades of hidden agendas, shadowy work practices, and corrupt leadership. As someone who hated Trump during his first term, it’s lovely seeing him growing into a great American leader up there with Reagan, Lincoln, and Washington

Tell me you've never audited anything without telling me you've never audited anything. Their 'audit' of the work conducted by 2k+ USAID employees that they conducted over the course of...less than a week? And where are these results you reference? And by results, I mean the results of audit fieldwork supported by sample-based testing - not Elon's feelings, thoughts, or opinions. I'll wait for you to provide a link.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DOGE’s goal is to right-size our government. It’s pretty obvious, just from their audit of USAID, that there is a lot of waste and excess in our government.

Does it add up to 75%? I doubt even DOGE knows until they conduct a similar audit of every agency, but it is a good enough starting point and is consistent with the results of their USAID audit that found definitively that only 294 positions out of 10,000 (or less then 3% of total staff) were necessary to actualize the goals set and established by Congress.

As an aside, it’s wonderful watching how open and transparent this administration has been compared to decades of hidden agendas, shadowy work practices, and corrupt leadership. As someone who hated Trump during his first term, it’s lovely seeing him growing into a great American leader up there with Reagan, Lincoln, and Washington

DOGE didn't do an "audit" of USAID. They tried to shut it down, completely.

Read the order Judge Nichols put out last night

When the Court asked the
government at the TRO hearing what harm would befall the government if it could not immediately
place on administrative leave the more than 2000 employees in question, it had no response—
beyond asserting without any record support that USAID writ large was possibly engaging in
“corruption and fraud.”

All hat, no cattle