SYC and Alexandria MLSN above ECNL teams?

[Anonymous]

Confirmed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An ECNL team beat Alexandria U19 MLSNEXT yesterday. The leagues seem to be more even for the non-academies than people think.

U19 is college and professional age for the better players. Already left MLS Next.

U19s are a mixed bag of remaining players for any club i

[Anonymous]

clearly a troll. Can't put SYC and ASA on the basket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are SYC and Alexandria clearly above the ECNL NL in Virginia? Or does it vary by age group?

Hahahaha - Kickball Thugs and Futsal Nerds? Get real. Just go with whichever club is closest to you to beat Nova traffic. MLS Next or ECNL, all the clubs are completely identical in three key aspects. (1) They will take a lot of money from you. (2) They will make you waste weeknights and weekends driving everywhere. (3) They will guarantee that your kid NEVER plays pro soccer because none of them care to develop players. It’s pay to play - financial incentives simply are not there to expend the extra time and effort to do more than pretend to care about your kid. And let’s not get delusional about college soccer either; these days they are mostly foreign players and there are very few slots for American boys. So it matters not one whit which mediocre club your son plays for because he is not getting a college scholarship. This MLSN vs ECNL debate is very silly. Only people who care are the MLSN staffers and their trolls trying to take market share from ECNL. Why don’t we just merge all the leagues again to stop all this nonsense?

Because this is a war. Nobody wants to concede or meet in the middle and do what's best, egos are at stake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are SYC and Alexandria clearly above the ECNL NL in Virginia? Or does it vary by age group?

Hahahaha - Kickball Thugs and Futsal Nerds? Get real. Just go with whichever club is closest to you to beat Nova traffic. MLS Next or ECNL, all the clubs are completely identical in three key aspects. (1) They will take a lot of money from you. (2) They will make you waste weeknights and weekends driving everywhere. (3) They will guarantee that your kid NEVER plays pro soccer because none of them care to develop players. It’s pay to play - financial incentives simply are not there to expend the extra time and effort to do more than pretend to care about your kid. And let’s not get delusional about college soccer either; these days they are mostly foreign players and there are very few slots for American boys. So it matters not one whit which mediocre club your son plays for because he is not getting a college scholarship. This MLSN vs ECNL debate is very silly. Only people who care are the MLSN staffers and their trolls trying to take market share from ECNL. Why don’t we just merge all the leagues again to stop all this nonsense?

ECNL dad jilted by MLSNext.

[Anonymous]

Meh, non-Academies and ECNL teams are about the same. No issues with my player being on either league (currently MLSN).

[Anonymous]

11-0 is not the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:11-0 is not the same.

That was a fluke and not a common thing. Enjoy in the glory for what it's worth cause it doesn't happen often if at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An ECNL team beat Alexandria U19 MLSNEXT yesterday. The leagues seem to be more even for the non-academies than people think.

Actually, this past weekend:

2 ECNL teams beat Alexandria MLSNext U19
1 ECNL team won and 1 ECNL lost to Alex MLSNext U16

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:11-0 is not the same.

That was a fluke and not a common thing. Enjoy in the glory for what it's worth cause it doesn't happen often if at all.

Why are you mad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are SYC and Alexandria clearly above the ECNL NL in Virginia? Or does it vary by age group?

Hahahaha - Kickball Thugs and Futsal Nerds? Get real. Just go with whichever club is closest to you to beat Nova traffic. MLS Next or ECNL, all the clubs are completely identical in three key aspects. (1) They will take a lot of money from you. (2) They will make you waste weeknights and weekends driving everywhere. (3) They will guarantee that your kid NEVER plays pro soccer because none of them care to develop players. It’s pay to play - financial incentives simply are not there to expend the extra time and effort to do more than pretend to care about your kid. And let’s not get delusional about college soccer either; these days they are mostly foreign players and there are very few slots for American boys. So it matters not one whit which mediocre club your son plays for because he is not getting a college scholarship. This MLSN vs ECNL debate is very silly. Only people who care are the MLSN staffers and their trolls trying to take market share from ECNL. Why don’t we just merge all the leagues again to stop all this nonsense?

correct we fighting for potential left over spots in college without scholarship. really desperate down here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:11-0 is not the same.

That was a fluke and not a common thing. Enjoy in the glory for what it's worth cause it doesn't happen often if at all.

I would definitely enjoy winning 11-0 over a mighty MLSNext team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:11-0 is not the same.

That was a fluke and not a common thing. Enjoy in the glory for what it's worth cause it doesn't happen often if at all.

Might be a fluke in the bigger picture, but around here it's becoming common.

[Anonymous]

Fluke or not, SYC def under 'performed' against ECNL teams at the best of cup

2010 Solar SC ECNL 1 SYC 0
Beach FC ECNL 0 SYC 2
Pipeline ECNL 1 SYC 0

2009 VDA ECNL 1 SYC 0
Philadelphia Ukrainian 1 SYC 2
IFA MLS Next 1 SYC 2

2008 SUSA FC ECNL 1 SYC 0
VDA ECNL 11 SYC 0

2006 Beach FC ECNL 2 SYC 1
Solar SC 1 SYC 1

[Anonymous]

SYC underperforming is becoming more common place on the boys side.